mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TRAPDOC: Deceiving LLM Users by Injecting Imperceptible Phantom Tokens into Documents

arXiv 2506.00089 ↗First posted 30 May 2025cs.CY cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The reasoning, writing, text-editing, and retrieval capabilities of proprietary large language models (LLMs) have advanced rapidly, providing users with an ever-expanding set of functionalities. However, this growing utility has also led to a serious societal concern: the over-reliance on LLMs. In particular, users increasingly delegate tasks such as homework, assignments, or the processing of sensitive documents to LLMs without meaningful engagement. This form of over-reliance and misuse is emerging as a significant social issue. In order to mitigate these issues, we propose a method injecting imperceptible phantom tokens into documents, which causes LLMs to generate outputs that appear plausible to users but are in fact incorrect. Based on this technique, we introduce TRAPDOC, a framework designed to deceive over-reliant LLM users. Through empirical evaluation, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework on proprietary LLMs, comparing its impact against several baselines. TRAPDOC serves as a strong foundation for promoting more responsible and thoughtful engagement with language models. Our code is available at https://github.com/jindong22/TrapDoc.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2025.

Builds on

24 of 40 references.

References · 24

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  4. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
  5. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
  6. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
  7. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
  8. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
  9. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
  10. 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 900
  11. 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 812
  12. 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 722
12 more
  1. 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 671
  2. 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 571
  3. 2020BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERTcited by 491
  4. 2021A Dataset of Information-Seeking Questions and Answers Anchored in Research Paperscited by 486
  5. 2020CodeBLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Code Synthesiscited by 479
  6. 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 424
  7. 2018TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applicationscited by 381
  8. 2020BAE: BERT-based Adversarial Examples for Text Classificationcited by 316
  9. 2023An LLM can Fool Itself: A Prompt-Based Adversarial Attackcited by 116
  10. 2020FAWA: Fast Adversarial Watermark Attack on Optical Character Recognition (OCR) Systemscited by 8
  11. 2019DuTongChuan: Context-aware Translation Model for Simultaneous Interpretingcited by 6
  12. 2019Self-Attention and Ingredient-Attention Based Model for Recipe Retrieval from Image Queriescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

6 papers.