DoPE: Decoy Oriented Perturbation Encapsulation Human-Readable, AI-Hostile Documents for Academic Integrity
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Document understanding and multimodal RAG
Abstract (arXiv)
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can directly consume exam documents, threatening conventional assessments and academic integrity. We present DoPE (Decoy-Oriented Perturbation Encapsulation), a document-layer defense framework that embeds semantic decoys into PDF/HTML assessments to exploit render-parse discrepancies in MLLM pipelines. By instrumenting exams at authoring time, DoPE provides model-agnostic prevention (stop or confound automated solving) and detection (flag blind AI reliance) without relying on conventional one-shot classifiers. We formalize prevention and detection tasks, and introduce FewSoRT-Q, an LLM-guided pipeline that generates question-level semantic decoys and FewSoRT-D to encapsulate them into watermarked documents. We evaluate on Integrity-Bench, a novel benchmark of 1826 exams (PDF+HTML) derived from public QA datasets and OpenCourseWare. Against black-box MLLMs from OpenAI and Anthropic, DoPE yields strong empirical gains: a 91.4% detection rate at an 8.7% false-positive rate using an LLM-as-Judge verifier, and prevents successful completion or induces decoy-aligned failures in 96.3% of attempts. We release Integrity-Bench, our toolkit, and evaluation code to enable reproducible study of document-layer defenses for academic integrity.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Document understanding and multimodal RAG, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 14 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2026.
Builds on
14 of 32 references.
References · 14
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
- 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,420
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
- 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 386
- 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
- 2023GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writerscited by 178
- 2024Technical Report on the Pangram AI-Generated Text Classifiercited by 34
- 2025Invisible Prompts, Visible Threats: Malicious Font Injection in External Resources for Large Language Modelscited by 11
- 2025TRAPDOC: Deceiving LLM Users by Injecting Imperceptible Phantom Tokens into Documentscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Show, Don't TELL: Explainable AI-Generated Text Detection27 May 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Integrity Shield A System for Ethical AI Use & Authorship Transparency in Assessments
- 2024DUPE: Detection Undermining via Prompt Engineering for Deepfake Text
- 2025In-Context Watermarks for Large Language Models
- 2026BEAR-Bench: A Bilingual Enterprise and Academic Reasoning Benchmark for Multimodal Models
- 2026What the Eyes See, the LLMs Miss: Exploiting Human Perception for Adversarial Text Attacks
- 2026Doc-PP: Document Policy Preservation Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models
- 2026RealDocBench: A Benchmark for Field-Level QA and Layout Understanding on Real-World Regulated Documents
- 2026On Seeding Watermarks to Detect Verbatim LLM Copy-Paste Responses