Mis-prompt: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Proactive Error Handling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant advancements in error handling. Current error-handling works are performed in a passive manner, with explicit error-handling instructions. However, in real-world scenarios, explicit error-handling instructions are usually unavailable. In this paper, our work identifies this challenge as how to conduct proactive error handling without explicit error handling instructions. To promote further research, this work introduces a new benchmark, termed Mis-prompt, consisting of four evaluation tasks, an error category taxonomy, and a new evaluation dataset. Furthermore, this work analyzes current LLMs' performance on the benchmark, and the experimental results reveal that current LLMs show poor performance on proactive error handling, and SFT on error handling instances improves LLMs' proactive error handling capabilities. The dataset will be publicly available.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2025.
Builds on
29 of 36 references.
References · 29
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
- 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,464
- 2024DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelcited by 1,135
- 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,121
17 more
- 2024Yi: Open Foundation Models by 01.AIcited by 719
- 2016A Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Deeper Understanding of Commonsense Storiescited by 417
- 2024ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 292
- 2021Understanding Factuality in Abstractive Summarization with FRANK: A Benchmark for Factuality Metricscited by 287
- 2023Inverse Scaling: When Bigger Isn't Bettercited by 207
- 2020Towards Conversational Recommendation over Multi-Type Dialogscited by 107
- 2023LLMs cannot find reasoning errors, but can correct them given the error locationcited by 85
- 2024MEDEC: A Benchmark for Medical Error Detection and Correction in Clinical Notescited by 80
- 2024Evaluating LLMs at Detecting Errors in LLM Responsescited by 50
- 2024Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models: A Focus on Error Identification and Correctioncited by 45
- 2024ErrorRadar: Benchmarking Complex Mathematical Reasoning of Multimodal Large Language Models Via Error Detectioncited by 37
- 2023FLEEK: Factual Error Detection and Correction with Evidence Retrieved from External Knowledgecited by 25
- 2020Grammatical Error Correction in Low Error Density Domains: A New Benchmark and Analysescited by 16
- 2022Robust and Explainable Identification of Logical Fallacies in Natural Language Argumentscited by 12
- 2024Insights into Natural Language Database Query Errors: From Attention Misalignment to User Handling Strategiescited by 12
- 2024FG-PRM: Fine-grained Hallucination Detection and Mitigation in Language Model Mathematical Reasoningcited by 12
- 2018A Systematic Review of Automated Grammar Checking in English Languagecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.