CaMMT: Benchmarking Culturally Aware Multimodal Machine Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Translating cultural content poses challenges for machine translation systems due to the differences in conceptualizations between cultures, where language alone may fail to convey sufficient context to capture region-specific meanings. In this work, we investigate whether images can act as cultural context in multimodal translation. We introduce CaMMT, a human-curated benchmark of over 5,800 triples of images along with parallel captions in English and regional languages. Using this dataset, we evaluate five Vision Language Models (VLMs) in text-only and text+image settings. Through automatic and human evaluations, we find that visual context generally improves translation quality, especially in handling Culturally-Specific Items (CSIs), disambiguation, and correct gender marking. By releasing CaMMT, our objective is to support broader efforts to build and evaluate multimodal translation systems that are better aligned with cultural nuance and regional variations.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2025.
Builds on
11 of 24 references.
References · 11
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
- 2023How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 348
- 2021To Ship or Not to Ship: An Extensive Evaluation of Automatic Metrics for Machine Translationcited by 163
- 2024CVQA: Culturally-diverse Multilingual Visual Question Answering Benchmarkcited by 120
- 2024Benchmarking Vision Language Models for Cultural Understandingcited by 101
- 2024All Languages Matter: Evaluating LMMs on Culturally Diverse 100 Languagescited by 55
- 2023Benchmarking Machine Translation with Cultural Awarenesscited by 53
- 2022Tackling Ambiguity with Images: Improved Multimodal Machine Translation and Contrastive Evaluationcited by 26
- 2024Cultural Adaptation of Menus: A Fine-Grained Approachcited by 8
- 2024Sentence-level Aggregation of Lexical Metrics Correlates Stronger with Human Judgements than Corpus-level Aggregationcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025ViDove: A Translation Agent System with Multimodal Context and Memory-Augmented Reasoningcited by 3
- 2026Toward Culturally Grounded Natural Language Processingcited by 0
- 2026Worlds Within Words: Translating Culture in Ancient Chinese Texts with Multi-Agent Coordinationcited by 0
- 2026CultureMINE: Datasets and Methods for Improving the Cultural Capabilities of NLP Systemscited by 0
- 2026CultureMINE: Datasets and Methods for Improving the Cultural Capabilities of NLP Systems18 Sep 2026
- 2026Worlds Within Words: Translating Culture in Ancient Chinese Texts with Multi-Agent Coordination31 May 2026
- 2026Toward Culturally Grounded Natural Language Processing27 Mar 2026
- 2025ViDove: A Translation Agent System with Multimodal Context and Memory-Augmented Reasoning9 Jul 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025MELLA: Bridging Linguistic Capability and Cultural Groundedness for Low-Resource Language MLLMs
- 2026MMTIT-Bench: A Multilingual and Multi-Scenario Benchmark with Cognition-Perception-Reasoning Guided Text-Image Machine Translation
- 2024Quantifying the Gaps Between Translation and Native Perception in Training for Multimodal, Multilingual Retrieval
- 2025Grounding Multilingual Multimodal LLMs With Cultural Knowledge
- 2025Beyond Words: Exploring Cultural Value Sensitivity in Multimodal Models
- 2025Rethinking Multilingual Vision-Language Translation: Dataset, Evaluation, and Adaptation
- 2024The Power of Many: Multi-Agent Multimodal Models for Cultural Image Captioning
- 2025CultureVLM: Characterizing and Improving Cultural Understanding of Vision-Language Models for over 100 Countries