WikiGap: Promoting Epistemic Equity by Surfacing Knowledge Gaps Between English Wikipedia and other Language Editions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With more than 11 times as many pageviews as the next largest edition, English Wikipedia dominates global knowledge access relative to other language editions. Readers are prone to assuming English Wikipedia as a superset of all language editions, leading many to prefer it even when their primary language is not English. Other language editions, however, comprise complementary facts rooted in their respective cultures and media environments, which are marginalized in English Wikipedia. While Wikipedia's user interface enables switching between language editions through its Interlanguage Link (ILL) system, it does not reveal to readers that other language editions contain valuable, complementary information. We present WikiGap, a system that surfaces complementary facts sourced from other Wikipedias within the English Wikipedia interface. Specifically, by combining a recent multilingual information-gap discovery method with a user-centered design, WikiGap enables access to complementary information from French, Russian, and Chinese Wikipedia. In a mixed-methods study (n=21), WikiGap significantly improved fact-finding accuracy, reduced task time, and received a 32-point higher usability score relative to Wikipedia's current ILL-based navigation system. Participants reported increased awareness of the availability of complementary information in non-English editions and reconsidered the completeness of English Wikipedia. WikiGap thus paves the way for improved epistemic equity across language editions.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 93 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2025.
Builds on
18 of 93 references.
References · 18
- 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,282
- 2020Language-agnostic BERT Sentence Embeddingcited by 627
- 2022Challenges and Strategies in Cross-Cultural NLPcited by 218
- 2020XOR QA: Cross-lingual Open-Retrieval Question Answeringcited by 121
- 2024WorldCuisines: A Massive-Scale Benchmark for Multilingual and Multicultural Visual Question Answering on Global Cuisinescited by 39
- 2025ECLeKTic: a Novel Challenge Set for Evaluation of Cross-Lingual Knowledge Transfercited by 29
- 2016Women Through the Glass Ceiling: Gender Asymmetries in Wikipediacited by 17
- 2013Where in the World are You? Geolocation and Language Identification in Twittercited by 11
- 2024Locating Information Gaps and Narrative Inconsistencies Across Languages: A Case Study of LGBT People Portrayals on Wikipediacited by 10
- 2013Multilinguals and Wikipedia Editingcited by 9
- 2019The Tower of Babel Meets Web 2.0: User-Generated Content and its Applications in a Multilingual Contextcited by 8
- 2019Not at Home on the Range: Peer Production and the Urban/Rural Dividecited by 6
6 more
- 2024Low-resourced Languages and Online Knowledge Repositories: A Need-Finding Studycited by 5
- 2023Governance Capture in a Self-Governing Community: A Qualitative Comparison of the Serbo-Croatian Wikipediascited by 4
- 2014Laboratories of Oligarchy? How the Iron Law Extends to Peer Productioncited by 2
- 2014Mining cross-cultural relations from Wikipedia - A study of 31 European food culturescited by 2
- 2023Bridging Nations: Quantifying the Role of Multilinguals in Communication on Social Mediacited by 2
- 2024Whose Knowledge is Valued?: Epistemic Injustice in CSCW Applicationscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.