mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Latent Reasoning via Sentence Embedding Prediction

arXiv 2505.22202 ↗First posted 28 May 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Autoregressive language models (LMs) generate one token at a time, yet human reasoning operates over higher-level abstractions - sentences, propositions, and concepts. This contrast raises a central question- Can LMs likewise learn to reason over structured semantic units rather than raw token sequences? In this work, we investigate whether pretrained LMs can be lifted into such abstract reasoning spaces by building on their learned representations. We present a framework that adapts a pretrained token-level LM to operate in sentence space by autoregressively predicting continuous embeddings of next sentences. We explore two embedding paradigms inspired by classical representation learning: 1) semantic embeddings, learned via autoencoding to preserve surface meaning; and 2) contextual embeddings, trained via next-sentence prediction to encode anticipatory structure. We evaluate both under two inference regimes: Discretized, which decodes each predicted embedding into text before re-encoding; and Continuous, which reasons entirely in embedding space for improved efficiency. Across four domains - mathematics, logic, commonsense, and planning - contextual embeddings under continuous inference show competitive performance with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) while reducing inference-time FLOPs on average by half. We also present early signs of scalability and modular adaptation. Finally, to visualize latent trajectories, we introduce SentenceLens, a diagnostic tool that decodes intermediate model states into interpretable sentences. Together, our results indicate that pretrained LMs can effectively transition to abstract, structured reasoning within latent embedding spaces.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 34 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2025.

Builds on

34 of 40 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025LLM Pretraining with Continuous Concepts12 Feb
  2. 2025Token Assorted: Mixing Latent and Text Tokens for Improved Language Model Reasoning5 Feb
  3. 2023Think before you speak: Training Language Models With Pause Tokens3 Oct

Other references · 31

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  5. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  6. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  7. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  8. 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,650
  9. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
  10. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
  11. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,104
  12. 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 982
19 more
  1. 2024Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Spacecited by 763
  2. 2015Generating Sentences from a Continuous Spacecited by 607
  3. 2017Word Translation Without Parallel Datacited by 480
  4. 2015Skip-Thought Vectorscited by 321
  5. 2024From Explicit CoT to Implicit CoT: Learning to Internalize CoT Step by Stepcited by 225
  6. 2025CODI: Compressing Chain-of-Thought into Continuous Space via Self-Distillationcited by 216
  7. 2015Semi-supervised Sequence Learningcited by 198
  8. 2023FLASK: Fine-grained Language Model Evaluation based on Alignment Skill Setscited by 198
  9. 2018An efficient framework for learning sentence representationscited by 197
  10. 2023In-context Autoencoder for Context Compression in a Large Language Modelcited by 190
  11. 2016A Hierarchical Latent Variable Encoder-Decoder Model for Generating Dialoguescited by 174
  12. 2017The Consciousness Priorcited by 105
  13. 2016Learning Distributed Representations of Sentences from Unlabelled Datacited by 90
  14. 2024Large Concept Models: Language Modeling in a Sentence Representation Spacecited by 86
  15. 2025Harnessing the Universal Geometry of Embeddingscited by 54
  16. 2025Cramming 1568 Tokens into a Single Vector and Back Again: Exploring the Limits of Embedding Space Capacitycited by 27
  17. 2025The Pitfalls of Imitation Learning when Actions are Continuouscited by 25
  18. 2024Exploring and Benchmarking the Planning Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 19
  19. 2024SentenceVAE: Enable Next-sentence Prediction for Large Language Models with Faster Speed, Higher Accuracy and Longer Contextcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Efficient Post-Training Refinement of Latent Reasoning in Large Language Models
  2. 2026Latent Recurrent Thoughts: Recurrent Refinement of Proposed Latents for Reasoning with Frozen LLMs
  3. 2026Reasoning with Latent Tokens in Diffusion Language Models
  4. 2026Why Struggle with Continuous Latents? Interpretable Discrete Latent Reasoning via Rendered Compression
  5. 2025Out-of-Context Reasoning in Large Language Models
  6. 2026SeLaR: Selective Latent Reasoning in Large Language Models
  7. 2026Language Models Struggle to Use Representations Learned In-Context
  8. 2025Diffusion vs. Autoregressive Language Models: A Text Embedding Perspective