mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Step-Wise Formal Verification for LLM-Based Mathematical Problem Solving

arXiv 2505.20869 ↗First posted 27 May 2025cs.AIcited by 5

On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated formidable capabilities in solving mathematical problems, yet they may still commit logical reasoning and computational errors during the problem-solving process. Thus, this paper proposes a framework, MATH-VF, which includes a Formalizer and a Critic, for formally verifying the correctness of the solutions generated by large language models. Our framework first utilizes a Formalizer which employs an LLM to translate a natural language solution into a formal context. Afterward, our Critic (which integrates various external tools such as a Computer Algebra System and an SMT solver) evaluates the correctness of each statement within the formal context, and when a statement is incorrect, our Critic provides corrective feedback. We empirically investigate the effectiveness of MATH-VF in two scenarios: 1) Verification: MATH-VF is utilized to determine the correctness of a solution to a given problem. 2) Refinement: When MATH-VF identifies errors in the solution generated by an LLM-based solution generator for a given problem, it submits the corrective suggestions proposed by the Critic to the solution generator to regenerate the solution. We evaluate our framework on widely used mathematical benchmarks: MATH500 and ProcessBench, demonstrating the superiority of our approach over existing approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 27 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2025.

Builds on

27 of 43 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Error Classification of Large Language Models on Math Word Problems: A Dynamically Adaptive Framework26 Jan
  2. 2024Not All Votes Count! Programs as Verifiers Improve Self-Consistency of Language Models for Math Reasoning16 Oct
  3. 2024Don't Trust: Verify -- Grounding LLM Quantitative Reasoning with Autoformalization26 Mar
  4. 2024MATHSENSEI: A Tool-Augmented Large Language Model for Mathematical Reasoning27 Feb

Other references · 23

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  3. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  4. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  5. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  6. 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 928
  7. 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 415
  8. 2023Logic-LM: Empowering Large Language Models with Symbolic Solvers for Faithful Logical Reasoningcited by 391
  9. 2024ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 292
  10. 2024When Can LLMs Actually Correct Their Own Mistakes? A Critical Survey of Self-Correction of LLMscited by 240
  11. 2024DeepSeek-Prover: Advancing Theorem Proving in LLMs through Large-Scale Synthetic Datacited by 234
  12. 2023ProofNet: Autoformalizing and Formally Proving Undergraduate-Level Mathematicscited by 192
11 more
  1. 2023LINC: A Neurosymbolic Approach for Logical Reasoning by Combining Language Models with First-Order Logic Proverscited by 168
  2. 2021Monte Carlo Tree Search: A Review of Recent Modifications and Applicationscited by 161
  3. 2023Deductive Verification of Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 124
  4. 2023SatLM: Satisfiability-Aided Language Models Using Declarative Promptingcited by 102
  5. 2025PRMBench: A Fine-grained and Challenging Benchmark for Process-Level Reward Modelscited by 99
  6. 2025Gold-medalist Performance in Solving Olympiad Geometry with AlphaGeometry2cited by 97
  7. 2024CriticBench: Benchmarking LLMs for Critique-Correct Reasoningcited by 88
  8. 2024Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Critique Models with Test-Time and Training-Time Supervisioncited by 60
  9. 2023GRACE: Discriminator-Guided Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 35
  10. 2025ProofAug: Efficient Neural Theorem Proving via Fine-grained Proof Structure Analysiscited by 11
  11. 2025Instantiation-based Formalization of Logical Reasoning Tasks using Language Models and Logical Solverscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Thinking Machines: Mathematical Reasoning in the Age of LLMs
  2. 2025From Informal to Formal -- Incorporating and Evaluating LLMs on Natural Language Requirements to Verifiable Formal Proofs
  3. 2025FormalMATH: Benchmarking Formal Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models
  4. 2025Evaluating Intermediate Reasoning of Code-Assisted Large Language Models for Mathematics
  5. 2026Rethinking Math Reasoning Evaluation: A Robust LLM-as-a-Judge Framework Beyond Symbolic Rigidity
  6. 2025HERMES: Towards Efficient and Verifiable Mathematical Reasoning in LLMs
  7. 2026Pipeline for Verifying LLM-Generated Mathematical Solutions
  8. 2023VerityMath: Advancing Mathematical Reasoning by Self-Verification Through Unit Consistency