mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LeCoDe: A Benchmark Dataset for Interactive Legal Consultation Dialogue Evaluation

arXiv 2505.19667 ↗First posted 26 May 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Legal consultation is essential for safeguarding individual rights and ensuring access to justice, yet remains costly and inaccessible to many individuals due to the shortage of professionals. While recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising path toward scalable, low-cost legal assistance, current systems fall short in handling the interactive and knowledge-intensive nature of real-world consultations. To address these challenges, we introduce LeCoDe, a real-world multi-turn benchmark dataset comprising 3,696 legal consultation dialogues with 110,008 dialogue turns, designed to evaluate and improve LLMs' legal consultation capability. With LeCoDe, we innovatively collect live-streamed consultations from short-video platforms, providing authentic multi-turn legal consultation dialogues. The rigorous annotation by legal experts further enhances the dataset with professional insights and expertise. Furthermore, we propose a comprehensive evaluation framework that assesses LLMs' consultation capabilities in terms of (1) clarification capability and (2) professional advice quality. This unified framework incorporates 12 metrics across two dimensions. Through extensive experiments on various general and domain-specific LLMs, our results reveal significant challenges in this task, with even state-of-the-art models like GPT-4 achieving only 39.8% recall for clarification and 59% overall score for advice quality, highlighting the complexity of professional consultation scenarios. Based on these findings, we further explore several strategies to enhance LLMs' legal consultation abilities. Our benchmark contributes to advancing research in legal domain dialogue systems, particularly in simulating more real-world user-expert interactions.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2025.

Builds on

25 of 53 references.

References · 25

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  5. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  6. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
  7. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  8. 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,121
  9. 2023LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 336
  10. 2024MediQ: Question-Asking LLMs and a Benchmark for Reliable Interactive Clinical Reasoningcited by 154
  11. 2023Large Language Models in Law: A Surveycited by 128
  12. 2024Limitations of the LLM-as-a-Judge Approach for Evaluating LLM Outputs in Expert Knowledge Taskscited by 106
13 more
  1. 2024AI Hospital: Benchmarking Large Language Models in a Multi-agent Medical Interaction Simulatorcited by 101
  2. 2025Beyond Single-Turn: A Survey on Multi-Turn Interactions with Large Language Modelscited by 62
  3. 2022A Multi-Task Benchmark for Korean Legal Language Understanding and Judgement Predictioncited by 44
  4. 2024LexEval: A Comprehensive Chinese Legal Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Modelscited by 37
  5. 2023Unlocking the Potential of User Feedback: Leveraging Large Language Model as User Simulator to Enhance Dialogue Systemcited by 32
  6. 2021Speaker and Time-aware Joint Contextual Learning for Dialogue-act Classification in Counselling Conversationscited by 31
  7. 2024Reliable LLM-based User Simulator for Task-Oriented Dialogue Systemscited by 25
  8. 2023The Cambridge Law Corpus: A Dataset for Legal AI Researchcited by 14
  9. 2024Knowledge-Infused Legal Wisdom: Navigating LLM Consultation through the Lens of Diagnostics and Positive-Unlabeled Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
  10. 2022Deradicalizing YouTube: Characterization, Detection, and Personalization of Religiously Intolerant Arabic Videoscited by 4
  11. 2022On the Effectiveness of Automated Metrics for Text Generation Systemscited by 4
  12. 2024A Measure of the System Dependence of Automated Metricscited by 2
  13. 2024DeliLaw: A Chinese Legal Counselling System Based on a Large Language Modelcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.