Model Agnostic Differentially Private Causal Inference
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Estimating causal effects from observational data is essential in fields such as medicine, economics and social sciences, where privacy concerns are paramount. We propose a general, model-agnostic framework for differentially private estimation of average treatment effects (ATE) that avoids strong structural assumptions on the data-generating process or the models used to estimate propensity scores and conditional outcomes. In contrast to prior work, which enforces differential privacy by directly privatizing these nuisance components, our approach decouples nuisance estimation from privacy protection. This separation allows the use of flexible, state-of-the-art black-box models, while differential privacy is achieved by perturbing only predictions and aggregation steps within a fold-splitting scheme with ensemble techniques. We instantiate the framework for three classical estimators -- the G-Formula, inverse propensity weighting (IPW), and augmented IPW (AIPW) -- and provide formal utility and privacy guarantees, together with privatized confidence intervals. Empirical results on synthetic and real data show that our methods maintain competitive performance under realistic privacy budgets.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2025.
Builds on
21 of 50 references.
References · 21
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 346
- 2018Scalable Private Learning with PATEcited by 269
- 2018Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoisingcited by 218
- 2017Knock Knock, Who's There? Membership Inference on Aggregate Location Datacited by 70
- 2015Differentially Private Release and Learning of Threshold Functionscited by 60
- 2019Estimating Treatment Effects with Causal Forests: An Applicationcited by 58
- 2021Accuracy, Interpretability, and Differential Privacy via Explainable Boostingcited by 24
- 2021Causal Inference with Corrupted Data: Measurement Error, Missing Values, Discretization, and Differential Privacycited by 18
- 2022Confidence-Ranked Reconstruction of Census Microdata from Published Statisticscited by 16
- 2022Differentially Private Estimation of Heterogeneous Causal Effectscited by 14
- 2024Hyperparameter Tuning for Causal Inference with Double Machine Learning: A Simulation Studycited by 11
9 more
- 2019Privacy-Preserving Causal Inference via Inverse Probability Weightingcited by 9
- 2023Locally Private Causal Inference for Randomized Experimentscited by 7
- 2024Differentially Private Estimation of Weighted Average Treatment Effects for Binary Outcomescited by 6
- 2025Gaussian DP for Reporting Differential Privacy Guarantees in Machine Learningcited by 6
- 2024Differentially Private Covariate Balancing Causal Inferencecited by 5
- 2025Differentially Private Learners for Heterogeneous Treatment Effectscited by 5
- 2023Differentially Private Multi-Site Treatment Effect Estimationcited by 4
- 2024Privacy-preserving Quantile Treatment Effect Estimation for Randomized Controlled Trialscited by 4
- 2023Federated Experiment Design under Distributed Differential Privacycited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.