Workload-Preserving Differentially Private Synthetic Data for Causal Inference via Maximum-Entropy Calibration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Workload-based differentially private (DP) synthetic data methods privately measure aggregate queries and post-process the noisy answers into synthetic records. Generic workloads can achieve strong distributional fidelity, but causal estimands such as the average treatment effect (ATE) depend on treatment-arm balance and outcome moments that generic marginals need not preserve. We propose causal workloads: DP query sets designed around the orthogonal moments used by doubly robust causal estimators. The released workload can be used directly by stable moment-map estimators or reconstructed by maximum-entropy calibration into reusable synthetic data; our theory decomposes ATE error into sampling, privacy, workload-approximation, Monte Carlo, and calibration terms. We also introduce Causal-AIM, an adaptive workload selector, and a noise-aware multiple-imputation (NA+MI) procedure for confidence intervals from DP synthetic data. Because the workload is released once, the same DP synthetic table can support ATE, ATT, and subgroup analyses without additional privacy spending. Empirically, causal workloads are most useful at strict privacy budgets and for calibrated uncertainty, while generic workloads often retain an advantage for point RMSE as privacy relaxes. The broader lesson is a tradeoff: distributional fidelity can help point accuracy, but valid causal inference requires preserving causal moments and propagating DP noise rather than treating synthetic rows as real.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2026.
Builds on
23 of 41 references.
References · 23
- 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 449
- 2017Causal Effect Inference with Deep Latent-Variable Modelscited by 410
- 2013A General Framework for Updating Belief Distributionscited by 175
- 2017Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: Lessons learned from a data analysis competitioncited by 106
- 2021Winning the NIST Contest: A scalable and general approach to differentially private synthetic datacited by 102
- 2014Inconsistency of Bayesian Inference for Misspecified Linear Models, and a Proposal for Repairing Itcited by 95
- 2022AIM: An Adaptive and Iterative Mechanism for Differentially Private Synthetic Datacited by 90
- 2021Benchmarking Differentially Private Synthetic Data Generation Algorithmscited by 81
- 2019Graphical-model based estimation and inference for differential privacycited by 74
- 2015Robust Bayesian inference via coarseningcited by 32
- 2021Differentially Private Quantilescited by 23
- 2022Differentially Private Estimation of Heterogeneous Causal Effectscited by 14
11 more
- 2016Comparative Study of Differentially Private Data Synthesis Methodscited by 13
- 2021Differentially Private Approximate Quantilescited by 12
- 2014Approximate Models and Robust Decisionscited by 10
- 2022Noise-Aware Statistical Inference with Differentially Private Synthetic Datacited by 9
- 2024Privacy-preserving data release leveraging optimal transport and particle gradient descentcited by 8
- 2024Differentially Private Covariate Balancing Causal Inferencecited by 5
- 2025Differentially Private Learners for Heterogeneous Treatment Effectscited by 5
- 2024Does Differentially Private Synthetic Data Lead to Synthetic Discoveries?cited by 4
- 2025Model Agnostic Differentially Private Causal Inferencecited by 2
- 2025PrivATE: Differentially Private Confidence Intervals for Average Treatment Effectscited by 2
- 2026CausalWrap: Model-Agnostic Causal Constraint Wrappers for Tabular Synthetic Datacited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.