mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Differentially Private Multi-Site Treatment Effect Estimation

arXiv 2310.06237 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2023cs.LG cs.CRcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Patient privacy is a major barrier to healthcare AI. For confidentiality reasons, most patient data remains in silo in separate hospitals, preventing the design of data-driven healthcare AI systems that need large volumes of patient data to make effective decisions. A solution to this is collective learning across multiple sites through federated learning with differential privacy. However, literature in this space typically focuses on differentially private statistical estimation and machine learning, which is different from the causal inference-related problems that arise in healthcare. In this work, we take a fresh look at federated learning with a focus on causal inference; specifically, we look at estimating the average treatment effect (ATE), an important task in causal inference for healthcare applications, and provide a federated analytics approach to enable ATE estimation across multiple sites along with differential privacy (DP) guarantees at each site. The main challenge comes from site heterogeneity -- different sites have different sample sizes and privacy budgets. We address this through a class of per-site estimation algorithms that reports the ATE estimate and its variance as a quality measure, and an aggregation algorithm on the server side that minimizes the overall variance of the final ATE estimate. Our experiments on real and synthetic data show that our method reliably aggregates private statistics across sites and provides better privacy-utility tradeoff under site heterogeneity than baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2023.

Builds on

19 of 44 references.

References · 19

  1. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  2. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
  3. 2017Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learningcited by 334
  4. 2018Beyond Inferring Class Representatives: User-Level Privacy Leakage From Federated Learningcited by 246
  5. 2018Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymitycited by 164
  6. 2018Distributed Differential Privacy via Shufflingcited by 115
  7. 2019The Privacy Blanket of the Shuffle Modelcited by 74
  8. 2019On Safeguarding Privacy and Security in the Framework of Federated Learningcited by 55
  9. 2017Prochlo: Strong Privacy for Analytics in the Crowdcited by 51
  10. 2019Scalable and Differentially Private Distributed Aggregation in the Shuffled Modelcited by 20
  11. 2021Private Counting from Anonymous Messages: Near-Optimal Accuracy with Vanishing Communication Overheadcited by 16
  12. 2020Pure Differentially Private Summation from Anonymous Messagescited by 15
7 more
  1. 2022Differentially Private Estimation of Heterogeneous Causal Effectscited by 14
  2. 2015Private Causal Inferencecited by 10
  3. 2019Privacy-Preserving Causal Inference via Inverse Probability Weightingcited by 9
  4. 2020On Distributed Differential Privacy and Counting Distinct Elementscited by 8
  5. 2014Learning from Data with Heterogeneous Noise using SGDcited by 4
  6. 2020Privacy-aware identificationcited by 4
  7. 2021Center-specific causal inference with multicenter trials: reinterpreting trial evidence in the context of each participating centercited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

4 papers.