Temperature is All You Need for Generalization in Langevin Dynamics and other Markov Processes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We analyze the generalization gap (gap between the training and test errors) when training a potentially over-parametrized model using a Markovian stochastic training algorithm, initialized from some distribution θ0 ~ p0. We focus on Langevin dynamics with a positive temperature β-1, i.e. gradient descent on a training loss L with infinitesimal step size, perturbed with β-1-variances Gaussian noise, and lightly regularized or bounded. There, we bound the generalization gap, at any time during training, by √(βmathbbE L (θ0) + log(1/δ))/N with probability 1-δ over the dataset, where N is the sample size, and mathbbE L (θ0) =O(1) with standard initialization scaling. In contrast to previous guarantees, we have no dependence on either training time or reliance on mixing, nor a dependence on dimensionality, gradient norms, or any other properties of the loss or model. This guarantee follows from a general analysis of any Markov process-based training that has a Gibbs-style stationary distribution. The proof is surprisingly simple, once we observe that the marginal distribution divergence from initialization remains bounded, as implied by a generalized second law of thermodynamics.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2025.
Builds on
39 of 73 references.
References · 39
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 681
- 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
- 2017Deep Neural Networks as Gaussian Processescited by 617
- 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 547
- 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 527
- 2018A Mean Field View of the Landscape of Two-Layers Neural Networkscited by 463
- 2017Implicit Regularization in Matrix Factorizationcited by 318
- 2018Gaussian Process Behaviour in Wide Deep Neural Networkscited by 314
27 more
- 2019Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 308
- 2018Stronger generalization bounds for deep nets via a compression approachcited by 306
- 2017Information-theoretic analysis of generalization capability of learning algorithmscited by 299
- 2017Stochastic Gradient Descent as Approximate Bayesian Inferencecited by 298
- 2017Size-Independent Sample Complexity of Neural Networkscited by 289
- 2017How to Escape Saddle Points Efficientlycited by 284
- 2017Non-convex learning via Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics: a nonasymptotic analysiscited by 242
- 2021User-friendly introduction to PAC-Bayes boundscited by 234
- 2019Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for SGLD via Data-Dependent Estimatescited by 118
- 2015How much does your data exploration overfit? Controlling bias via information usagecited by 95
- 2022On the Implicit Bias in Deep-Learning Algorithmscited by 84
- 2017Generalization Bounds of SGLD for Non-convex Learning: Two Theoretical Viewpointscited by 82
- 2018Generalization Error Bounds for Noisy, Iterative Algorithmscited by 79
- 2022PAC-Bayes Compression Bounds So Tight That They Can Explain Generalizationcited by 75
- 2020On the role of data in PAC-Bayes boundscited by 64
- 2021Stochastic Training is Not Necessary for Generalizationcited by 63
- 2019On Generalization Error Bounds of Noisy Gradient Methods for Non-Convex Learningcited by 57
- 2021Random Neural Networks in the Infinite Width Limit as Gaussian Processescited by 43
- 2022High Probability Bounds for a Class of Nonconvex Algorithms with AdaGrad Stepsizecited by 40
- 2021Time-independent Generalization Bounds for SGLD in Non-convex Settingscited by 27
- 2022Stability and Generalization Analysis of Gradient Methods for Shallow Neural Networkscited by 21
- 2024How Uniform Random Weights Induce Non-uniform Bias: Typical Interpolating Neural Networks Generalize with Narrow Teacherscited by 18
- 2024What is the long-run distribution of stochastic gradient descent? A large deviations analysiscited by 17
- 2021Learning with Gradient Descent and Weakly Convex Lossescited by 16
- 2023Time-Independent Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for SGLDcited by 12
- 2023Generalization Guarantees of Gradient Descent for Multi-Layer Neural Networkscited by 9
- 2024Uniform Generalization Bounds on Data-Dependent Hypothesis Sets via PAC-Bayesian Theory on Random Setscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.