Taming LLMs with Negative Samples: A Reference-Free Framework to Evaluate Presentation Content with Actionable Feedback
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The generation of presentation slides automatically is an important problem in the era of generative AI. This paper focuses on evaluating multimodal content in presentation slides that can effectively summarize a document and convey concepts to a broad audience. We introduce a benchmark dataset, RefSlides, consisting of human-made high-quality presentations that span various topics. Next, we propose a set of metrics to characterize different intrinsic properties of the content of a presentation and present REFLEX, an evaluation approach that generates scores and actionable feedback for these metrics. We achieve this by generating negative presentation samples with different degrees of metric-specific perturbations and use them to fine-tune LLMs. This reference-free evaluation technique does not require ground truth presentations during inference. Our extensive automated and human experiments demonstrate that our evaluation approach outperforms classical heuristic-based and state-of-the-art large language model-based evaluations in generating scores and explanations.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2025.
Builds on
25 of 37 references.
References · 25
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
- 2019MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distancecited by 418
- 2020Towards Question-Answering as an Automatic Metric for Evaluating the Content Quality of a Summarycited by 88
- 2020Hard negative examples are hard, but usefulcited by 82
- 2024Are Large Language Models Capable of Generating Human-Level Narratives?cited by 79
- 2023ChatGPT as a Factual Inconsistency Evaluator for Text Summarizationcited by 75
- 2024Efficient multi-prompt evaluation of LLMscited by 73
13 more
- 2020SUPERT: Towards New Frontiers in Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Multi-Document Summarizationcited by 69
- 2022On the Limitations of Reference-Free Evaluations of Generated Textcited by 52
- 2021D2S: Document-to-Slide Generation Via Query-Based Text Summarizationcited by 50
- 2024Finding Blind Spots in Evaluator LLMs with Interpretable Checklistscited by 32
- 2024FENICE: Factuality Evaluation of summarization based on Natural language Inference and Claim Extractioncited by 28
- 2017A Semantic QA-Based Approach for Text Summarization Evaluationcited by 17
- 2024Enhancing Presentation Slide Generation by LLMs with a Multi-Staged End-to-End Approachcited by 17
- 2024A Comparative Study of Quality Evaluation Methods for Text Summarizationcited by 13
- 2024Presentations are not always linear! GNN meets LLM for Document-to-Presentation Transformation with Attributioncited by 10
- 2023HAUSER: Towards Holistic and Automatic Evaluation of Simile Generationcited by 5
- 2024Unveiling Narrative Reasoning Limits of Large Language Models with Trope in Movie Synopsescited by 5
- 2024EasyJudge: an Easy-to-use Tool for Comprehensive Response Evaluation of LLMscited by 3
- 2024Reading Order Independent Metrics for Information Extraction in Handwritten Documentscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.