mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

EasyJudge: an Easy-to-use Tool for Comprehensive Response Evaluation of LLMs

arXiv 2410.09775 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2024cs.AI cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, there has been a growing trend of employing large language models (LLMs) to judge the quality of other LLMs. Many studies have adopted closed-source models, mainly using GPT-4 as the evaluator. However, due to the closed-source nature of the GPT-4 model, employing it as an evaluator has resulted in issues including transparency, controllability, and cost-effectiveness. Some researchers have turned to using fine-tuned open-source LLMs as evaluators. However, existing open-source evaluation LLMs generally lack a user-friendly visualization tool, and they have not been optimized for accelerated model inference, which causes inconvenience for researchers with limited resources and those working across different fields. This paper presents EasyJudge, a model developed to evaluate significant language model responses. It is lightweight, precise, efficient, and user-friendly, featuring an intuitive visualization interface for ease of deployment and use. EasyJudge uses detailed datasets and refined prompts for model optimization, achieving strong consistency with human and proprietary model evaluations. The model optimized with quantitative methods enables EasyJudge to run efficiently on consumer-grade GPUs or even CPUs. We also provide detailed analysis and case studies to further reveal the potential of our method.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2024.

Builds on

11 of 21 references.

References · 11

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  5. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  6. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
  7. 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 729
  8. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
  9. 2023Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Modelscited by 558
  10. 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 486
  11. 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 311

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.