EasyJudge: an Easy-to-use Tool for Comprehensive Response Evaluation of LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, there has been a growing trend of employing large language models (LLMs) to judge the quality of other LLMs. Many studies have adopted closed-source models, mainly using GPT-4 as the evaluator. However, due to the closed-source nature of the GPT-4 model, employing it as an evaluator has resulted in issues including transparency, controllability, and cost-effectiveness. Some researchers have turned to using fine-tuned open-source LLMs as evaluators. However, existing open-source evaluation LLMs generally lack a user-friendly visualization tool, and they have not been optimized for accelerated model inference, which causes inconvenience for researchers with limited resources and those working across different fields. This paper presents EasyJudge, a model developed to evaluate significant language model responses. It is lightweight, precise, efficient, and user-friendly, featuring an intuitive visualization interface for ease of deployment and use. EasyJudge uses detailed datasets and refined prompts for model optimization, achieving strong consistency with human and proprietary model evaluations. The model optimized with quantitative methods enables EasyJudge to run efficiently on consumer-grade GPUs or even CPUs. We also provide detailed analysis and case studies to further reveal the potential of our method.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2024.
Builds on
11 of 21 references.
References · 11
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
- 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 729
- 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
- 2023Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Modelscited by 558
- 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 486
- 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 311
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025Taming LLMs with Negative Samples: A Reference-Free Framework to Evaluate Presentation Content with Actionable Feedbackcited by 2
- 2026Who Judges the Judge? Evaluating LLM-as-a-Judge for French Medical open-ended QAcited by 2
- 2026LLM-as-an-Annotator: Training Lightweight Models with LLM-Annotated Examples for Aspect Sentiment Tuple Predictioncited by 0
- 2026Who Judges the Judge? Evaluating LLM-as-a-Judge for French Medical open-ended QA4 Mar 2026
- 2026LLM-as-an-Annotator: Training Lightweight Models with LLM-Annotated Examples for Aspect Sentiment Tuple Prediction2 Mar 2026
- 2025Taming LLMs with Negative Samples: A Reference-Free Framework to Evaluate Presentation Content with Actionable Feedback23 May 2025