Activation Control for Efficiently Eliciting Long Chain-of-thought Ability of Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite the remarkable reasoning performance, eliciting the long chain-of-thought (CoT) ability in large language models (LLMs) typically requires costly reinforcement learning or supervised fine-tuning on high-quality distilled data. We investigate the internal mechanisms behind this capability and show that a small set of high-impact activations in the last few layers largely governs long-form reasoning attributes, such as output length and self-reflection. By simply amplifying these activations and inserting "wait" tokens, we can invoke the long CoT ability without any training, resulting in significantly increased self-reflection rates and accuracy. Moreover, we find that the activation dynamics follow predictable trajectories, with a sharp rise after special tokens and a subsequent exponential decay. Building on these insights, we introduce a general training-free activation control technique. It leverages a few contrastive examples to identify key activations, and employs simple analytic functions to modulate their values at inference time to elicit long CoTs. Extensive experiments confirm the effectiveness of our method in efficiently eliciting long CoT reasoning in LLMs and improving their performance. Additionally, we propose a parameter-efficient fine-tuning method that trains only a last-layer activation amplification module and a few LoRA layers, outperforming full LoRA fine-tuning on reasoning benchmarks with significantly fewer parameters. Our code and data are publicly released.
Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 50 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2025.
Builds on
50 of 53 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Unlocking General Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models via Representation Engineering14 Mar
- 2025LLMs Can Easily Learn to Reason from Demonstrations Structure, not content, is what matters!11 Feb
- 2025RedStar: Does Scaling Long-CoT Data Unlock Better Slow-Reasoning Systems?20 Jan
- 2024Distilling System 2 into System 18 Jul
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models21 Mar
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models28 Jan
Other references · 44
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
32 more
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,830
- 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,392
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
- 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMscited by 1,210
- 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 928
- 2023Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Modelcited by 861
- 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 767
- 2022Galactica: A Large Language Model for Sciencecited by 744
- 2022PAL: Program-aided Language Modelscited by 652
- 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 609
- 2021Knowledge Neurons in Pretrained Transformerscited by 601
- 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 532
- 2022Language Models are Multilingual Chain-of-Thought Reasonerscited by 530
- 2025LIMO: Less is More for Reasoningcited by 498
- 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 480
- 2023RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tearscited by 463
- 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervisioncited by 441
- 2023Llemma: An Open Language Model For Mathematicscited by 388
- 2023Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methodscited by 359
- 2025Demystifying Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMscited by 326
- 2025rStar-Math: Small LLMs Can Master Math Reasoning with Self-Evolved Deep Thinkingcited by 313
- 2025Crossing the Reward Bridge: Expanding RL with Verifiable Rewards Across Diverse Domainscited by 156
- 2025OpenCodeReasoning: Advancing Data Distillation for Competitive Codingcited by 113
- 2024RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMscited by 90
- 2025Virgo: A Preliminary Exploration on Reproducing o1-like MLLMcited by 68
- 2025Overtrained Language Models Are Harder to Fine-Tunecited by 58
- 2025Code to Think, Think to Code: A Survey on Code-Enhanced Reasoning and Reasoning-Driven Code Intelligence in LLMscited by 47
- 2024JiuZhang3.0: Efficiently Improving Mathematical Reasoning by Training Small Data Synthesis Modelscited by 45
- 2025Adaptive Group Policy Optimization: Towards Stable Training and Token-Efficient Reasoningcited by 21
- 2024An Investigation of Neuron Activation as a Unified Lens to Explain Chain-of-Thought Eliciting Arithmetic Reasoning of LLMscited by 20
- 2025Hybrid Group Relative Policy Optimization: A Multi-Sample Approach to Enhancing Policy Optimizationcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 9.
13 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2025Understanding Reasoning in Thinking Language Models via Steering Vectorscited by 72
- 2026FIRE-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on the Rediscovery of Scientific Insightscited by 16
- 2025Hidden Dynamics of Massive Activations in Transformer Trainingcited by 10
- 2026The Hidden Signal of Verifier Strictness: Controlling and Improving Step-Wise Verification via Selective Latent Steeringcited by 5
- 2025Logit Arithmetic Elicits Long Reasoning Capabilities Without Trainingcited by 4
- 2026NEAT: Neuron-Based Early Exit for Large Reasoning Modelscited by 3
- 2025Logit Arithmetic Elicits Long Reasoning Capabilities Without Trainingcited by 2
- 2026The Tell-Tale Norm: ℓ2 Magnitude as a Signal for Reasoning Dynamics in Large Language Modelscited by 2
- 2026Oops, Wait: Discourse Tokens Matter in Reasoning Modelcited by 1
- 2026How Do Answer Tokens Read Reasoning Traces? Self-Reading Patterns in Thinking LLMs for Quantitative Reasoningcited by 1
- 2026Behavior Cue Reasoning: Monitorable Reasoning Improves Efficiency and Safety through Oversightcited by 0
- 2026PrimeScientist: Strategic Allocation of Research Effort in Autonomous Researchcited by 0
- 2026SFT Leaves a Reproducible Signature in Activation Geometry: Calibrating Post-Training Interpretability Against Run-to-Run Noise12 Oct 2026
- 2026PrimeScientist: Strategic Allocation of Research Effort in Autonomous Research15 Sep 2026
- 2026The Tell-Tale Norm: ℓ2 Magnitude as a Signal for Reasoning Dynamics in Large Language Models4 Jun 2026
- 2026The Hidden Signal of Verifier Strictness: Controlling and Improving Step-Wise Verification via Selective Latent Steering20 May 2026
- 2026Behavior Cue Reasoning: Monitorable Reasoning Improves Efficiency and Safety through Oversight7 May 2026
- 2026How Do Answer Tokens Read Reasoning Traces? Self-Reading Patterns in Thinking LLMs for Quantitative Reasoning21 Apr 2026
- 2026FIRE-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on the Rediscovery of Scientific Insights2 Feb 2026
- 2026NEAT: Neuron-Based Early Exit for Large Reasoning Models2 Feb 2026
- 2026Oops, Wait: Discourse Tokens Matter in Reasoning Model24 Jan 2026
- 2025Logit Arithmetic Elicits Long Reasoning Capabilities Without Training10 Oct 2025
- 2025Hidden Dynamics of Massive Activations in Transformer Training5 Aug 2025
- 2025Logit Arithmetic Elicits Long Reasoning Capabilities Without Training17 Jul 2025
1 more
- 2025Understanding Reasoning in Thinking Language Models via Steering Vectorscited by 72
- 2025Logit Arithmetic Elicits Long Reasoning Capabilities Without Trainingcited by 4
- 2026NEAT: Neuron-Based Early Exit for Large Reasoning Modelscited by 3
- 2025Logit Arithmetic Elicits Long Reasoning Capabilities Without Trainingcited by 2
- 2026The Tell-Tale Norm: ℓ2 Magnitude as a Signal for Reasoning Dynamics in Large Language Modelscited by 2
- 2026Oops, Wait: Discourse Tokens Matter in Reasoning Modelcited by 1
- 2026How Do Answer Tokens Read Reasoning Traces? Self-Reading Patterns in Thinking LLMs for Quantitative Reasoningcited by 1
- 2026Behavior Cue Reasoning: Monitorable Reasoning Improves Efficiency and Safety through Oversightcited by 0
- 2026The Tell-Tale Norm: ℓ2 Magnitude as a Signal for Reasoning Dynamics in Large Language Models4 Jun 2026
- 2026Behavior Cue Reasoning: Monitorable Reasoning Improves Efficiency and Safety through Oversight7 May 2026
- 2026How Do Answer Tokens Read Reasoning Traces? Self-Reading Patterns in Thinking LLMs for Quantitative Reasoning21 Apr 2026
- 2026NEAT: Neuron-Based Early Exit for Large Reasoning Models2 Feb 2026
- 2026Oops, Wait: Discourse Tokens Matter in Reasoning Model24 Jan 2026
- 2025Logit Arithmetic Elicits Long Reasoning Capabilities Without Training10 Oct 2025
- 2025Logit Arithmetic Elicits Long Reasoning Capabilities Without Training17 Jul 2025
- 2025Understanding Reasoning in Thinking Language Models via Steering Vectors22 Jun 2025
- 2025Hidden Dynamics of Massive Activations in Transformer Trainingcited by 10
- 2026The Hidden Signal of Verifier Strictness: Controlling and Improving Step-Wise Verification via Selective Latent Steeringcited by 5
- 2026SFT Leaves a Reproducible Signature in Activation Geometry: Calibrating Post-Training Interpretability Against Run-to-Run Noisecited by 0
- 2026SFT Leaves a Reproducible Signature in Activation Geometry: Calibrating Post-Training Interpretability Against Run-to-Run Noise12 Oct 2026
- 2026The Hidden Signal of Verifier Strictness: Controlling and Improving Step-Wise Verification via Selective Latent Steering20 May 2026
- 2025Hidden Dynamics of Massive Activations in Transformer Training5 Aug 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024On the Hardness of Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2025When More is Less: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Length in LLMs
- 2026S3-CoT: Self-Sampled Succinct Reasoning Enables Efficient Chain-of-Thought LLMs
- 2026Facts Don't Speak Louder than Words: The Behavioral Essence of Long-CoT Distillation
- 2024Uncovering Latent Chain of Thought Vectors in Language Models
- 2025Adaptive Deep Reasoning: Triggering Deep Thinking When Needed
- 2025The Challenge of Teaching Reasoning to LLMs Without RL or Distillation
- 2025Why Does Reasoning Length Converge? Unveiling the Underfitting-Overfitting Trade-off in Chain-of-Thought