Fair Supervised Learning Through Constraints on Smooth Nonconvex Unfairness-Measure Surrogates
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A new strategy for fair supervised machine learning is proposed. The main advantages of the proposed strategy as compared to others in the literature are as follows. (a) We introduce a new smooth nonconvex surrogate to approximate the Heaviside functions involved in discontinuous unfairness measures. The surrogate is based on smoothing methods from the optimization literature, and is new for the fair supervised learning literature. The surrogate is a tight approximation which ensures the trained prediction models are fair, as opposed to other (e.g., convex) surrogates that can fail to lead to a fair prediction model in practice. (b) Rather than rely on regularizers (that lead to optimization problems that are difficult to solve) and corresponding regularization parameters (that can be expensive to tune), we propose a strategy that employs hard constraints so that specific tolerances for unfairness can be enforced without the complications associated with the use of regularization. (c) Our proposed strategy readily allows for constraints on multiple (potentially conflicting) unfairness measures at the same time. Multiple measures can be considered with a regularization approach, but at the cost of having even more difficult optimization problems to solve and further expense for tuning. By contrast, through hard constraints, our strategy leads to optimization models that can be solved tractably with minimal tuning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2025.
Builds on
20 of 47 references.
References · 20
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
- 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 449
- 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
- 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
- 2018Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?cited by 262
- 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
- 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
8 more
- 2019Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: Evaluating Claims and Practicescited by 174
- 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 153
- 2018Classification with Fairness Constraints: A Meta-Algorithm with Provable Guaranteescited by 146
- 2018Optimization with Non-Differentiable Constraints with Applications to Fairness, Recall, Churn, and Other Goalscited by 103
- 2016Satisfying Real-world Goals with Dataset Constraintscited by 68
- 2018FNNC: Achieving Fairness through Neural Networkscited by 43
- 2018Fairness-aware Classification: Criterion, Convexity, and Boundscited by 14
- 2023Understanding Fairness Surrogate Functions in Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.