HAVA: Hybrid Approach to Value-Alignment through Reward Weighing for Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Our society is governed by a set of norms which together bring about the values we cherish such as safety, fairness or trustworthiness. The goal of value-alignment is to create agents that not only do their tasks but through their behaviours also promote these values. Many of the norms are written as laws or rules (legal / safety norms) but even more remain unwritten (social norms). Furthermore, the techniques used to represent these norms also differ. Safety / legal norms are often represented explicitly, for example, in some logical language while social norms are typically learned and remain hidden in the parameter space of a neural network. There is a lack of approaches in the literature that could combine these various norm representations into a single algorithm. We propose a novel method that integrates these norms into the reinforcement learning process. Our method monitors the agent's compliance with the given norms and summarizes it in a quantity we call the agent's reputation. This quantity is used to weigh the received rewards to motivate the agent to become value-aligned. We carry out a series of experiments including a continuous state space traffic problem to demonstrate the importance of the written and unwritten norms and show how our method can find the value-aligned policies. Furthermore, we carry out ablations to demonstrate why it is better to combine these two groups of norms rather than using either separately.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2025.
Builds on
15 of 32 references.
References · 15
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
- 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 785
- 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 759
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 625
- 2017Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 449
- 2017Noisy Networks for Explorationcited by 266
- 2018Building Ethically Bounded AIcited by 22
- 2017A Low-Cost Ethics Shaping Approach for Designing Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 18
- 2018Incorporating Behavioral Constraints in Online AI Systemscited by 16
- 2021Training Value-Aligned Reinforcement Learning Agents Using a Normative Priorcited by 14
- 2020Online Shielding for Stochastic Systemscited by 11
- 2017Norm Conflict Resolution in Stochastic Domainscited by 7
3 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Moral Alignment for LLM Agents
- 2021MORAL: Aligning AI with Human Norms through Multi-Objective Reinforced Active Learning
- 2024On the Essence and Prospect: An Investigation of Alignment Approaches for Big Models
- 2021Value alignment: a formal approach
- 2018Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research direction
- 2025The Specification Trap: Why Static Value Alignment Alone Is Insufficient for Robust Alignment
- 2025Toward Virtuous Reinforcement Learning: A Critique and Roadmap
- 2019Learning Norms from Stories: A Prior for Value Aligned Agents