mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Virtual Cells: Predict, Explain, Discover

arXiv 2505.14613 ↗First posted 20 May 2025cs.LG q-bio.QMcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Drug discovery is fundamentally a process of inferring the effects of treatments on patients, and would therefore benefit immensely from computational models that can reliably simulate patient responses, enabling researchers to generate and test large numbers of therapeutic hypotheses safely and economically before initiating costly clinical trials. Even a more specific model that predicts the functional response of cells to a wide range of perturbations would be tremendously valuable for discovering safe and effective treatments that successfully translate to the clinic. Creating such virtual cells has long been a goal of the computational research community that unfortunately remains unachieved given the daunting complexity and scale of cellular biology. Nevertheless, recent advances in AI, computing power, lab automation, and high-throughput cellular profiling provide new opportunities for reaching this goal. In this perspective, we present a vision for developing and evaluating virtual cells that builds on our experience at Recursion. We argue that in order to be a useful tool to discover novel biology, virtual cells must accurately predict the functional response of a cell to perturbations and explain how the predicted response is a consequence of modifications to key biomolecular interactions. We then introduce key principles for designing therapeutically-relevant virtual cells, describe a lab-in-the-loop approach for generating novel insights with them, and advocate for biologically-grounded benchmarks to guide virtual cell development. Finally, we make the case that our approach to virtual cells provides a useful framework for building other models at higher levels of organization, including virtual patients. We hope that these directions prove useful to the research community in developing virtual models optimized for positive impact on drug discovery outcomes.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 118 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2025.

Builds on

12 of 118 references.

References · 12

  1. 2023GFlowNets for AI-Driven Scientific Discoverycited by 63
  2. 2024How to Build the Virtual Cell with Artificial Intelligence: Priorities and Opportunitiescited by 50
  3. 2024Generative Modeling of Molecular Dynamics Trajectoriescited by 48
  4. 2023Gotta be SAFE: A New Framework for Molecular Designcited by 45
  5. 2024On the Scalability of GNNs for Molecular Graphscited by 36
  6. 2024SynFlowNet: Design of Diverse and Novel Molecules with Synthesis Constraintscited by 26
  7. 2023Goal-conditioned GFlowNets for Controllable Multi-Objective Molecular Designcited by 17
  8. 2024Benchmarking Transcriptomics Foundation Models for Perturbation Analysis : one PCA still rules them allcited by 17
  9. 2024Training and Serving System of Foundation Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 11
  10. 2024Automated Discovery of Pairwise Interactions from Unstructured Datacited by 8
  11. 2023Generative artificial intelligence for de novo protein designcited by 5
  12. 2024Efficient Biological Data Acquisition through Inference Set Designcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.

7 papers.