mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficient Biological Data Acquisition through Inference Set Design

arXiv 2410.19631 ↗First posted 25 Oct 2024cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In drug discovery, highly automated high-throughput laboratories are used to screen a large number of compounds in search of effective drugs. These experiments are expensive, so one might hope to reduce their cost by only experimenting on a subset of the compounds, and predicting the outcomes of the remaining experiments. In this work, we model this scenario as a sequential subset selection problem: we aim to select the smallest set of candidates in order to achieve some desired level of accuracy for the system as a whole. Our key observation is that, if there is heterogeneity in the difficulty of the prediction problem across the input space, selectively obtaining the labels for the hardest examples in the acquisition pool will leave only the relatively easy examples to remain in the inference set, leading to better overall system performance. We call this mechanism inference set design, and propose the use of a confidence-based active learning solution to prune out these challenging examples. Our algorithm includes an explicit stopping criterion that interrupts the acquisition loop when it is sufficiently confident that the system has reached the target performance. Our empirical studies on image and molecular datasets, as well as a real-world large-scale biological assay, show that active learning for inference set design leads to significant reduction in experimental cost while retaining high system performance.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2024.

Builds on

16 of 53 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  2. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
  3. 2021ResMLP: Feedforward networks for image classification with data-efficient trainingcited by 338
  4. 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
  5. 2021Active Learning by Acquiring Contrastive Examplescited by 154
  6. 2022DeepCore: A Comprehensive Library for Coreset Selection in Deep Learningcited by 146
  7. 2018Less is more: sampling chemical space with active learningcited by 80
  8. 2017Practical Coreset Constructions for Machine Learningcited by 75
  9. 2020Accelerating high-throughput virtual screening through molecular pool-based active learningcited by 59
  10. 2023RxRx1: A Dataset for Evaluating Experimental Batch Correction Methodscited by 45
  11. 2016A Benchmark and Comparison of Active Learning for Logistic Regressioncited by 36
  12. 2024On the Scalability of GNNs for Molecular Graphscited by 36
4 more
  1. 2018Pool-Based Sequential Active Learning for Regressioncited by 33
  2. 2021Molecule3D: A Benchmark for Predicting 3D Geometries from Molecular Graphscited by 31
  3. 2021Occlusion Handling in Generic Object Detection: A Reviewcited by 25
  4. 2022Autonomous Drug Design with Multi-Armed Banditscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.