mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Coarse-to-Fine Process Reward Modeling for Mathematical Reasoning

arXiv 2501.13622 ↗First posted 23 Jan 2025cs.AIcited by 7

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

The Process Reward Model (PRM) plays a crucial role in mathematical reasoning tasks, requiring high-quality supervised process data. However, we observe that reasoning steps generated by Large Language Models (LLMs) often fail to exhibit strictly incremental information, leading to redundancy that can hinder effective reasoning. To address this issue, we propose CFPRM, a simple yet effective coarse-to-fine strategy. Instead of focusing on the detection of redundant steps, our approach first establishes a coarse-grained window to merge adjacent reasoning steps into unified, holistic steps. The window size is then progressively reduced to extract fine-grained reasoning steps, enabling data collection at multiple granularities for training. By leveraging this hierarchical refinement process, CFPRM mitigates redundancy while preserving essential fine-grained knowledge. Extensive experiments on two reasoning datasets across three loss criteria validate the CFPRM's effectiveness and versatility.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 13 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2025.

Builds on

13 of 14 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Process Reward Model with Q-Value Rankings15 Oct
  2. 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoning10 Oct
  3. 2024ReST-MCTS*: LLM Self-Training via Process Reward Guided Tree Search6 Jun
  4. 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May
  5. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback25 Nov

Other references · 8

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  4. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  5. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
  6. 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 965
  7. 2023Challenges and Applications of Large Language Modelscited by 251
  8. 2024GSM-Plus: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs as Mathematical Problem Solverscited by 155

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025R-PRM: Reasoning-Driven Process Reward Modeling
  2. 2023Let's Reinforce Step by Step
  3. 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoning
  4. 2025An Efficient and Precise Training Data Construction Framework for Process-supervised Reward Model in Mathematical Reasoning
  5. 2023Let's reward step by step: Step-Level reward model as the Navigators for Reasoning
  6. 2025From Mathematical Reasoning to Code: Generalization of Process Reward Models in Test-Time Scaling
  7. 2025Accelerating LLM Reasoning via Early Rejection with Partial Reward Modeling
  8. 2025Uncertainty-Based Methods for Automated Process Reward Data Construction and Output Aggregation in Mathematical Reasoning