mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Let's Verify Math Questions Step by Step

arXiv 2505.13903 ↗First posted 20 May 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 18

On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently achieved remarkable progress in mathematical reasoning. To enable such capabilities, many existing works distill strong reasoning models into long chains of thought or design algorithms to construct high-quality math question-answer (QA) data for training. However, these efforts primarily focus on generating correct reasoning paths and answers, while largely overlooking the correctness of the questions themselves. In this work, we present ValiMath, a benchmark consisting of 2147 human-verified mathematical questions covering a wide range of domains such as arithmetic, algebra, and geometry, which are synthesized and curated from the NuminaMath dataset. Each question is annotated with its logical structure, domain coverage, and question correctness, enabling fine-grained evaluation of question quality. ValiMath serves as a high-quality gold-standard test set for validating mathematical questions in LLM training corpora. Building upon this benchmark, we further propose MathQ-Verify, a pipeline that performs fine-grained parsing of mathematical questions into atomic assumptions and conclusions, and evaluates their semantic soundness through consistency checks. This pipeline achieves high precision in detecting flawed questions and provides a reliable foundation for cleaning noisy mathematical datasets. Experiments show that MathQ-Verify achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple benchmarks, improving the F1 score by up to 25 percentage points over the direct verification baseline. MathQ-Verify offers a scalable and accurate solution for curating reliable mathematical datasets, reducing label noise and avoiding unnecessary computation on invalid questions. Our code and data are available at the repository https://github.com/OpenDCAI/MathQ-Verify.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 4 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2025.

Builds on

4 of 7 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024MathGenie: Generating Synthetic Data with Question Back-translation for Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning of LLMs26 Feb

Other references · 3

  1. 2024Large language models surpass human experts in predicting neuroscience resultscited by 69
  2. 2023On the Creativity of Large Language Modelscited by 57
  3. 2025TreeCut: A Synthetic Unanswerable Math Word Problem Dataset for LLM Hallucination Evaluationcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 11.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025DataFlow: An LLM-Driven Framework for Unified Data Preparation and Workflow Automation in the Era of Data-Centric AIcited by 23
  2. 2025From Scores to Steps: Diagnosing and Improving LLM Performance in Evidence-Based Medical Calculationscited by 11
  3. 2025GGBench: A Geometric Generative Reasoning Benchmark for Unified Multimodal Modelscited by 6
  4. 2026AgenticRAGTracer: A Hop-Aware Benchmark for Diagnosing Multi-Step Retrieval Reasoning in Agentic RAGcited by 5
  5. 2026LongVidSearch: An Agentic Benchmark for Multi-hop Evidence Retrieval Planning in Long Videoscited by 4
  6. 2025Can Large Multimodal Models Actively Recognize Faulty Inputs? A Systematic Evaluation Framework of Their Input Scrutiny Abilitycited by 3
  7. 2026Towards Next-Generation LLM Training: From the Data-Centric Perspectivecited by 3
  8. 2026OpenWorldLib: A Unified Codebase and Definition of Advanced World Modelscited by 3
  9. 2026Rethinking Math Reasoning Evaluation: A Robust LLM-as-a-Judge Framework Beyond Symbolic Rigiditycited by 3
  10. 2026GraphPO: Graph-based Policy Optimization for Reasoning Modelscited by 3
  11. 2025Judge Before Answer: Can MLLM Discern the False Premise in Question?cited by 2
  12. 2025MorphoBench: A Benchmark with Difficulty Adaptive to Model Reasoningcited by 2
6 more
  1. 2026MathMixup: Boosting LLM Mathematical Reasoning with Difficulty-Controllable Data Synthesis and Curriculum Learningcited by 1
  2. 2026RREDCoT: Segment-Level Reward Redistribution for Reasoning Modelscited by 1
  3. 2026DataPrep-Bench: Benchmarking LLMs as Training Data Preparatorscited by 1
  4. 2025Hard Negative Sample-Augmented DPO Post-Training for Small Language Modelscited by 0
  5. 2026Guided Verifier: Collaborative Multimodal Reasoning via Dynamic Process Supervisioncited by 0
  6. 2026Questioning the Questions: Sustaining Self-Evolution in Reasoning Modelscited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026More Accurate or More Efficient? Evaluating Locally Deployed Compact Open-Weight Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning
  2. 2023MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Models
  3. 2024Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Key Condition Verification
  4. 2025FormalMATH: Benchmarking Formal Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models
  5. 2026The CompMath-MCQ Dataset: Are LLMs Ready for Higher-Level Math?
  6. 2025Arrows of Math Reasoning Data Synthesis for Large Language Models: Diversity, Complexity and Correctness
  7. 2025ReliableMath: Benchmark of Reliable Mathematical Reasoning on Large Language Models
  8. 2023VerityMath: Advancing Mathematical Reasoning by Self-Verification Through Unit Consistency