AdAEM: An Adaptively and Automated Extensible Measurement of LLMs' Value Difference
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Assessing Large Language Models'(LLMs) underlying value differences enables comprehensive comparison of their misalignment, cultural adaptability, and biases. Nevertheless, current value measurement methods face the informativeness challenge: with often outdated, contaminated, or generic test questions, they can only capture the orientations on comment safety values, e.g., HHH, shared among different LLMs, leading to indistinguishable and uninformative results. To address this problem, we introduce AdAEM, a novel, self-extensible evaluation algorithm for revealing LLMs' inclinations. Distinct from static benchmarks, AdAEM automatically and adaptively generates and extends its test questions. This is achieved by probing the internal value boundaries of a diverse set of LLMs developed across cultures and time periods in an in-context optimization manner. Such a process theoretically maximizes an information-theoretic objective to extract diverse controversial topics that can provide more distinguishable and informative insights about models' value differences. In this way, AdAEM is able to co-evolve with the development of LLMs, consistently tracking their value dynamics. We use AdAEM to generate novel questions and conduct an extensive analysis, demonstrating our method's validity and effectiveness, laying the groundwork for better interdisciplinary research on LLMs' values and alignment. Codes and the generated evaluation questions are released at https://github.com/ValueCompass/AdAEM.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 99 of its 164 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2025.
Builds on
99 of 164 references.
References · 99
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
- 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
- 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,255
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,184
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
38 more
- 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 860
- 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 836
- 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 723
- 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 701
- 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 518
- 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 481
- 2022ToxiGen: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial and Implicit Hate Speech Detectioncited by 422
- 2023Trustworthy LLMs: a Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models' Alignmentcited by 401
- 2023NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmarkcited by 348
- 2023Multi-step Jailbreaking Privacy Attacks on ChatGPTcited by 333
- 2023ToolQA: A Dataset for LLM Question Answering with External Toolscited by 274
- 2023The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learningcited by 257
- 2022Black-Box Tuning for Language-Model-as-a-Servicecited by 256
- 2023Challenges and Applications of Large Language Modelscited by 254
- 2023PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traitscited by 234
- 2023PromptAgent: Strategic Planning with Language Models Enables Expert-level Prompt Optimizationcited by 233
- 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 229
- 2023Red-Teaming Large Language Models using Chain of Utterances for Safety-Alignmentcited by 223
- 2023Evaluating the Moral Beliefs Encoded in LLMscited by 215
- 2023Inverse Scaling: When Bigger Isn't Bettercited by 207
- 2023Assessing Cross-Cultural Alignment between ChatGPT and Human Societies: An Empirical Studycited by 206
- 2022WANLI: Worker and AI Collaboration for Natural Language Inference Dataset Creationcited by 202
- 2023SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Large Language Modelscited by 199
- 2022Fine-tuning language models to find agreement among humans with diverse preferencescited by 189
- 2023Do-Not-Answer: A Dataset for Evaluating Safeguards in LLMscited by 184
- 2025Know Me, Respond to Me: Benchmarking LLMs for Dynamic User Profiling and Personalized Responses at Scalecited by 178
- 2023Model evaluation for extreme riskscited by 177
- 2023Time Travel in LLMs: Tracing Data Contamination in Large Language Modelscited by 177
- 2023Benchmarking Foundation Models with Language-Model-as-an-Examinercited by 172
- 2023Generative Language Models and Automated Influence Operations: Emerging Threats and Potential Mitigationscited by 158
- 2022Probing Pre-Trained Language Models for Cross-Cultural Differences in Valuescited by 149
- 2023Cultural Bias and Cultural Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 149
- 2024The PRISM Alignment Dataset: What Participatory, Representative and Individualised Human Feedback Reveals About the Subjective and Multicultural Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 144
- 2024Investigating Cultural Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 143
- 2023Investigating Data Contamination in Modern Benchmarks for Large Language Modelscited by 138
- 2020Moral Stories: Situated Reasoning about Norms, Intents, Actions, and their Consequencescited by 135
- 2022Evaluating and Inducing Personality in Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 123
- 2023Black-Box Prompt Optimization: Aligning Large Language Models without Model Trainingcited by 122
50 most cited of 99 All 99 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4.
4 papers.
- 2025Counterfactual Reasoning for Steerable Pluralistic Value Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2025PICACO: Pluralistic In-Context Value Alignment of LLMs via Total Correlation Optimizationcited by 3
- 2025On the Dynamics of Multi-Agent LLM Communities Driven by Value Diversitycited by 3
- 2025IROTE: Human-like Traits Elicitation of Large Language Model via In-Context Self-Reflective Optimizationcited by 1
- 2025On the Dynamics of Multi-Agent LLM Communities Driven by Value Diversity11 Dec 2025
- 2025Counterfactual Reasoning for Steerable Pluralistic Value Alignment of Large Language Models21 Oct 2025
- 2025IROTE: Human-like Traits Elicitation of Large Language Model via In-Context Self-Reflective Optimization12 Aug 2025
- 2025PICACO: Pluralistic In-Context Value Alignment of LLMs via Total Correlation Optimization22 Jul 2025