Detect and Correct: A Selective Noise Correction Method for Learning with Noisy Labels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Falsely annotated samples, also known as noisy labels, can significantly harm the performance of deep learning models. Two main approaches for learning with noisy labels are global noise estimation and data filtering. Global noise estimation approximates the noise across the entire dataset using a noise transition matrix, but it can unnecessarily adjust correct labels, leaving room for local improvements. Data filtering, on the other hand, discards potentially noisy samples but risks losing valuable data. Our method identifies potentially noisy samples based on their loss distribution. We then apply a selection process to separate noisy and clean samples and learn a noise transition matrix to correct the loss for noisy samples while leaving the clean data unaffected, thereby improving the training process. Our approach ensures robust learning and enhanced model performance by preserving valuable information from noisy samples and refining the correction process. We applied our method to standard image datasets (MNIST, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100) and a biological scRNA-seq cell-type annotation dataset. We observed a significant improvement in model accuracy and robustness compared to traditional methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.
Builds on
25 of 46 references.
References · 25
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
- 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 629
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
13 more
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 256
- 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
- 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
- 2020Dual T: Reducing Estimation Error for Transition Matrix in Label-noise Learningcited by 142
- 2019Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labelscited by 122
- 2019Image Classification with Deep Learning in the Presence of Noisy Labels: A Surveycited by 101
- 2021Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Pointscited by 97
- 2018Learning to Teach with Dynamic Loss Functionscited by 40
- 2022Identifiability of Label Noise Transition Matrixcited by 34
- 2023NoisywikiHow: A Benchmark for Learning with Real-world Noisy Labels in Natural Language Processingcited by 8
- 2023Anomaly Detection with Variance Stabilized Density Estimationcited by 8
- 2023Domain-Generalizable Multiple-Domain Clusteringcited by 7
- 2017Contaminated speech training methods for robust DNN-HMM distant speech recognitioncited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.