mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Hidden Dangers of Browsing AI Agents

arXiv 2505.13076 ↗First posted 19 May 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 11

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous browsing agents powered by large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to automate web-based tasks. However, their reliance on dynamic content, tool execution, and user-provided data exposes them to a broad attack surface. This paper presents a comprehensive security evaluation of such agents, focusing on systemic vulnerabilities across multiple architectural layers. Our work outlines the first end-to-end threat model for browsing agents and provides actionable guidance for securing their deployment in real-world environments. To address discovered threats, we propose a defense in depth strategy incorporating input sanitization, planner executor isolation, formal analyzers, and session safeguards. These measures protect against both initial access and post exploitation attack vectors. Through a white box analysis of a popular open source project, Browser Use, we demonstrate how untrusted web content can hijack agent behavior and lead to critical security breaches. Our findings include prompt injection, domain validation bypass, and credential exfiltration, evidenced by a disclosed CVE and a working proof of concept exploit.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 14 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.

Builds on

14 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Security of AI Agents12 Jun

Other references · 13

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  3. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
  4. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
  5. 2023Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Webcited by 1,210
  6. 2023Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Modelscited by 608
  7. 2024WebVoyager: Building an End-to-End Web Agent with Large Multimodal Modelscited by 424
  8. 2023Detecting Language Model Attacks with Perplexitycited by 411
  9. 2023A Real-World WebAgent with Planning, Long Context Understanding, and Program Synthesiscited by 350
  10. 2024AI Agents Under Threat: A Survey of Key Security Challenges and Future Pathwayscited by 122
  11. 2024System-Level Defense against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks: An Information Flow Control Perspectivecited by 91
  12. 2024Goal-guided Generative Prompt Injection Attack on Large Language Modelscited by 22
1 more
  1. 2023Towards more Practical Threat Models in Artificial Intelligence Securitycited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 9; 2026: 2.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Building Browser Agents: Architecture, Security, and Practical Solutions
  2. 2026WAAA! Web Adversaries Against Agentic Browsers
  3. 2025BrowseSafe: Understanding and Preventing Prompt Injection Within AI Browser Agents
  4. 2025Mind the Web: The Security of Web Use Agents
  5. 2025Why Are Web AI Agents More Vulnerable Than Standalone LLMs? A Security Analysis
  6. 2025Privacy Practices of Browser Agents
  7. 2026From Secure Agentic AI to Secure Agentic Web: Challenges, Threats, and Future Directions
  8. 2026Known By Their Actions: Fingerprinting LLM Browser Agents via UI Traces