Predicting Reaction Time to Comprehend Scenes with Foveated Scene Understanding Maps
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Although models exist that predict human response times (RTs) in tasks such as target search and visual discrimination, the development of image-computable predictors for scene understanding time remains an open challenge. Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs), which can generate scene descriptions for arbitrary images, combined with the availability of quantitative metrics for comparing linguistic descriptions, offer a new opportunity to model human scene understanding. We hypothesize that the primary bottleneck in human scene understanding and the driving source of variability in response times across scenes is the interaction between the foveated nature of the human visual system and the spatial distribution of task-relevant visual information within an image. Based on this assumption, we propose a novel image-computable model that integrates foveated vision with VLMs to produce a spatially resolved map of scene understanding as a function of fixation location (Foveated Scene Understanding Map, or F-SUM), along with an aggregate F-SUM score. This metric correlates with average (N=17) human RTs (r=0.47) and number of saccades (r=0.51) required to comprehend a scene (across 277 scenes). The F-SUM score also correlates with average (N=16) human description accuracy (r=-0.56) in time-limited presentations. These correlations significantly exceed those of standard image-based metrics such as clutter, visual complexity, and scene ambiguity based on language entropy. Together, our work introduces a new image-computable metric for predicting human response times in scene understanding and demonstrates the importance of foveated visual processing in shaping comprehension difficulty.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.
Builds on
15 of 44 references.
References · 15
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
- 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 819
- 2024DeepSeek-VL: Towards Real-World Vision-Language Understandingcited by 733
- 2018Universal Sentence Encodercited by 489
- 2024NV-Embed: Improved Techniques for Training LLMs as Generalist Embedding Modelscited by 472
- 2024Kernel Language Entropy: Fine-grained Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs from Semantic Similaritiescited by 159
- 2024Jasper and Stella: distillation of SOTA embedding modelscited by 112
- 2025Gemini Embedding: Generalizable Embeddings from Geminicited by 94
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026The Limits of Learning from Pictures and Text: Vision-Language Models and Embodied Scene Understanding
- 2026Semantic Saliency from Multi-Modal Large Language Model Scene Understanding Maps
- 2026Revealing the Gap in Human and VLM Scene Perception through Counterfactual Semantic Saliency
- 2026Why We Look Where We Look: Emergent Human-like Fixations of a Foveated Visual Language Model Maximizing Scene Understanding
- 2026Seeing the Scene Matters: Revealing Forgetting in Video Understanding Models with a Scene-Aware Long-Video Benchmark
- 2025VLM4D: Towards Spatiotemporal Awareness in Vision Language Models
- 2023Synthesize, Diagnose, and Optimize: Towards Fine-Grained Vision-Language Understanding
- 2024What's in the Image? A Deep-Dive into the Vision of Vision Language Models