mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Limits of Learning from Pictures and Text: Vision-Language Models and Embodied Scene Understanding

arXiv 2603.26589 ↗First posted 27 Mar 2026cs.CVcited by 2

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

What information is sufficient to learn the full richness of human scene understanding? The distributional hypothesis holds that the statistical co-occurrence of language and images captures the conceptual knowledge underlying visual cognition. Vision-language models (VLMs) are trained on massive paired text-image corpora but lack embodied experience, making them an ideal test of the distributional hypothesis. We report two experiments comparing descriptions generated by 18 VLMs to those of over 2000 human observers across 15 high-level scene understanding tasks, spanning general knowledge, affordances, sensory experiences, affective responses, and future prediction. Because many tasks lack ground truth answers, we developed a Human-Calibrated Cosine Distance (HCD) metric that measures VLM output similarity to the distribution of human responses, scaled by within-human variability. In Experiment 1, VLMs approached human-level performance on general knowledge tasks, but showed a robust deficit for affordance tasks that resisted prompt engineering and did not improve with newer model releases. In Experiment 2, we tested six mechanistic hypotheses for explaining this affordance gap, finding that the deficit was structural rather than stylistic and was not resolved by providing explicit spatial information. Corpus analyses revealed that image captioning datasets contain sparse agent-addressed affordance language, consistent with Gricean accounts of why embodied knowledge may be systematically underrepresented in language. Together, these findings suggest that distributional learning from images and text is insufficient for affordance-based scene understanding, implying that some dimensions of human visual cognition may require the kind of agent-centered, three-dimensional experience that no photograph or caption can encode.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 22 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Mar 2026.

Builds on

22 of 60 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Visual Language Models show widespread visual deficits on neuropsychological tests15 Apr

Other references · 21

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  4. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  5. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  6. 2021Conceptual 12M: Pushing Web-Scale Image-Text Pre-Training To Recognize Long-Tail Visual Conceptscited by 1,209
  7. 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 973
  8. 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 719
  9. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
  10. 2018WikiHow: A Large Scale Text Summarization Datasetcited by 203
  11. 2021RedCaps: web-curated image-text data created by the people, for the peoplecited by 175
  12. 2023Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity but reduces the diversity of novel contentcited by 165
9 more
  1. 2022Do Large Language Models know what humans know?cited by 60
  2. 2023Large language models predict human sensory judgments across six modalitiescited by 47
  3. 2026Theory of Space: Can Foundation Models Construct Spatial Beliefs through Active Exploration?cited by 18
  4. 2023Gromov-Wasserstein unsupervised alignment reveals structural correspondences between the color similarity structures of humans and large language modelscited by 16
  5. 2024Sniff AI: Is My 'Spicy' Your 'Spicy'? Exploring LLM's Perceptual Alignment with Human Smell Experiencescited by 7
  6. 2024Rethinking Emotion Annotations in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 7
  7. 2025Measuring AI "Slop" in Textcited by 6
  8. 2025The Zero Body Problem: Probing LLM Use of Sensory Languagecited by 5
  9. 2025The time course of visuo-semantic representations in the human brain is captured by combining vision and language modelscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Real Images, Worse Judgments: Evaluating Vision-Language Models on Concreteness and Imagery
  2. 2026Revealing the Gap in Human and VLM Scene Perception through Counterfactual Semantic Saliency
  3. 2026Would you still call this Dax? Novel Visual References in VLMs and Humans
  4. 2025Does Visual Grounding Enhance the Understanding of Embodied Knowledge in Large Language Models?
  5. 2026Seeing or Knowing? Visual Context Sensitivity in Multimodal Large Language Models
  6. 2025Perceiving Beyond Language Priors: Enhancing Visual Comprehension and Attention in Multimodal Models
  7. 2024What's in the Image? A Deep-Dive into the Vision of Vision Language Models
  8. 2024See It from My Perspective: How Language Affects Cultural Bias in Image Understanding