mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Never Skip a Batch: Dense Learning of Temporal GNNs via Adaptive Pseudo-Supervision

arXiv 2505.12526 ↗First posted 18 May 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Temporal graph networks suffer from irregular supervision in realworld dynamic graphs, as most minibatches contain few labeled events. The lack of labels leads to high-variance gradient updates and, consequently, slow wall-clock convergence. To constructively reduce sparsity, our Moving-Averaged Labels (MAL) assigns soft pseudo-targets based on past supervised signals using a running label distribution while leaving the loss and the model architecture unchanged. Thus, supervision gaps are replaced with informative signals independent of a temporal graph model and the message passing or memory components used. Theoretical analysis supports our insight that aggregating historical supervision into moving average targets reduces stochastic gradient variance, yielding faster convergence under mild assumptions. Experimentally, for TGNv2 and DyRepv2 (our modification of DyRep) models, MAL boosts predictive performance, establishing a new SOTA, and improves time-to-accuracy (on average 6x faster to reach the top score) for a common suite of Temporal Graph Benchmark datasets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2025.

Builds on

20 of 39 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,311
  3. 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,150
  4. 2014Convex Optimization: Algorithms and Complexitycited by 575
  5. 2019Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 510
  6. 2020Inductive Representation Learning on Temporal Graphscited by 462
  7. 2019Predicting Dynamic Embedding Trajectory in Temporal Interaction Networkscited by 448
  8. 2018T-GCN: A Temporal Graph ConvolutionalNetwork for Traffic Predictioncited by 401
  9. 2021Inductive Representation Learning in Temporal Networks via Causal Anonymous Walkscited by 193
  10. 2023Towards Better Dynamic Graph Learning: New Architecture and Unified Librarycited by 157
  11. 2023Do We Really Need Complicated Model Architectures For Temporal Networks?cited by 143
  12. 2023Temporal Graph Benchmark for Machine Learning on Temporal Graphscited by 138
8 more
  1. 2020Unifying Graph Convolutional Neural Networks and Label Propagationcited by 98
  2. 2019Session-based Social Recommendation via Dynamic Graph Attention Networkscited by 76
  3. 2018A Unified Analysis of Stochastic Momentum Methods for Deep Learningcited by 55
  4. 2021Dynaboard: An Evaluation-As-A-Service Platform for Holistic Next-Generation Benchmarkingcited by 53
  5. 2022Informative Pseudo-Labeling for Graph Neural Networks with Few Labelscited by 19
  6. 2024Does It Look Sequential? An Analysis of Datasets for Evaluation of Sequential Recommendationscited by 15
  7. 2020Mutual Teaching for Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 8
  8. 2024Enhancing the Expressivity of Temporal Graph Networks through Source-Target Identificationcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.