Residual Feature Integration is Sufficient to Prevent Negative Transfer
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Transfer learning has become a central paradigm in modern machine learning, yet it suffers from the long-standing problem of negative transfer, where leveraging source representations can harm rather than help performance on the target task. Although empirical remedies have been proposed, there remains little theoretical understanding of how to reliably avoid negative transfer. In this paper, we investigate a simple yet remarkably effective strategy: augmenting frozen, pretrained source-side features with a trainable target-side encoder that adapts target features to capture residual signals overlooked by models pretrained on the source data. We show this residual feature integration strategy is sufficient to provably prevent negative transfer, by establishing theoretical guarantees that it has no worse convergence rate than training from scratch under the informative class of target distributions up to logarithmic factors, and that the convergence rate can transition seamlessly from nonparametric to near-parametric when source representations are informative. To our knowledge, this is the first theoretical work that ensures protection against negative transfer. We carry out extensive numerical experiments across image, text and tabular benchmarks, and empirically verify that the method consistently safeguards performance under distribution shift, label noise, semantic perturbation, and class imbalance. We additionally demonstrate that this residual integration mechanism uniquely supports adapt-time multimodality extension, enabling a pretrained single-cell foundation model to incorporate spatial signals for lymph-node anatomical classification despite the source model being trained without them. Our study thus advances the theory of safe transfer learning, and provides a principled approach that is simple, robust, architecture-agnostic, and broadly applicable.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2025.
Builds on
28 of 56 references.
References · 28
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
- 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,603
- 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,331
- 2017Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomycited by 1,013
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
- 2017Nonparametric regression using deep neural networks with ReLU activation functioncited by 433
- 2019Transfusion: Understanding Transfer Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 368
- 2018Characterizing and Avoiding Negative Transfercited by 229
16 more
- 2017Optimal approximation of piecewise smooth functions using deep ReLU neural networkscited by 179
- 2019Not Enough Data? Deep Learning to the Rescue!cited by 175
- 2018Adaptivity of deep ReLU network for learning in Besov and mixed smooth Besov spaces: optimal rate and curse of dimensionalitycited by 162
- 2021Neural Collapse Under MSE Loss: Proximity to and Dynamics on the Central Pathcited by 158
- 2020A Survey on Negative Transfercited by 122
- 2018GAN Augmentation: Augmenting Training Data using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 107
- 2022On the Optimization Landscape of Neural Collapse under MSE Loss: Global Optimality with Unconstrained Featurescited by 97
- 2022Quality Not Quantity: On the Interaction between Dataset Design and Robustness of CLIPcited by 97
- 2017The Relative Performance of Ensemble Methods with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Classificationcited by 50
- 2024Scaling laws for learning with real and surrogate datacited by 27
- 2022The good, the bad and the ugly sides of data augmentation: An implicit spectral regularization perspectivecited by 24
- 2023When More is Less: Incorporating Additional Datasets Can Hurt Performance By Introducing Spurious Correlationscited by 18
- 2024Lessons and Insights from a Unifying Study of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) in Visual Recognitioncited by 16
- 2017Online and Offline Domain Adaptation for Reducing BCI Calibration Effortcited by 10
- 2020Experience Selection Using Dynamics Similarity for Efficient Multi-Source Transfer Learning Between Robotscited by 7
- 2022Transfer learning with affine model transformationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.