mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deepfake Forensic Analysis: Source Dataset Attribution and Legal Implications of Synthetic Media Manipulation

arXiv 2505.11110 ↗First posted 16 May 2025cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Synthetic media generated by Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) pose significant challenges in verifying authenticity and tracing dataset origins, raising critical concerns in copyright enforcement, privacy protection, and legal compliance. This paper introduces a novel forensic framework for identifying the training dataset (e.g., CelebA or FFHQ) of GAN-generated images through interpretable feature analysis. By integrating spectral transforms (Fourier/DCT), color distribution metrics, and local feature descriptors (SIFT), our pipeline extracts discriminative statistical signatures embedded in synthetic outputs. Supervised classifiers (Random Forest, SVM, XGBoost) achieve 98-99% accuracy in binary classification (real vs. synthetic) and multi-class dataset attribution across diverse GAN architectures (StyleGAN, AttGAN, GDWCT, StarGAN, and StyleGAN2). Experimental results highlight the dominance of frequency-domain features (DCT/FFT) in capturing dataset-specific artifacts, such as upsampling patterns and spectral irregularities, while color histograms reveal implicit regularization strategies in GAN training. We further examine legal and ethical implications, showing how dataset attribution can address copyright infringement, unauthorized use of personal data, and regulatory compliance under frameworks like GDPR and California's AB 602. Our framework advances accountability and governance in generative modeling, with applications in digital forensics, content moderation, and intellectual property litigation.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2025.

Builds on

23 of 44 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
  3. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  4. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,588
  5. 2017StarGAN: Unified Generative Adversarial Networks for Multi-Domain Image-to-Image Translationcited by 1,039
  6. 2018MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Networkcited by 409
  7. 2022On the detection of synthetic images generated by diffusion modelscited by 283
  8. 2020The Creation and Detection of Deepfakes: A Surveycited by 247
  9. 2021Spatial-Phase Shallow Learning: Rethinking Face Forgery Detection in Frequency Domaincited by 244
  10. 2017AttGAN: Facial Attribute Editing by Only Changing What You Wantcited by 242
  11. 2020Media Forensics and DeepFakes: an overviewcited by 209
  12. 2020Artificial Fingerprinting for Generative Models: Rooting Deepfake Attribution in Training Datacited by 201
11 more
  1. 2021Dataset Inference: Ownership Resolution in Machine Learningcited by 116
  2. 2018Noiseprint: a CNN-based camera model fingerprintcited by 114
  3. 2018In Ictu Oculi: Exposing AI Generated Fake Face Videos by Detecting Eye Blinkingcited by 54
  4. 2018Image-to-Image Translation via Group-wise Deep Whitening-and-Coloring Transformationcited by 49
  5. 2022Deepfake Network Architecture Attributioncited by 47
  6. 2020DeepFakesON-Phys: DeepFakes Detection based on Heart Rate Estimationcited by 29
  7. 2024Exposing Lip-syncing Deepfakes from Mouth Inconsistenciescited by 15
  8. 2023GenAI Mirage: The Impostor Bias and the Deepfake Detection Challenge in the Era of Artificial Illusionscited by 10
  9. 2024DeepFeatureX Net: Deep Features eXtractors based Network for discriminating synthetic from real imagescited by 6
  10. 2024Continuous fake media detection: adapting deepfake detectors to new generative techniquescited by 6
  11. 2022Deepfake Style Transfer Mixture: a First Forensic Ballistics Study on Synthetic Imagescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.