mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CleanPatrick: A Benchmark for Image Data Cleaning

arXiv 2505.11034 ↗First posted 16 May 2025cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Robust machine learning depends on clean data, yet current image data cleaning benchmarks rely on synthetic noise or narrow human studies, limiting comparison and real-world relevance. We introduce CleanPatrick, the first large-scale benchmark for data cleaning in the image domain, built upon the publicly available Fitzpatrick17k dermatology dataset. We collect 496,377 binary annotations from 933 medical crowd workers, identify off-topic samples (4%), near-duplicates (21%), and label errors (32%), and employ an aggregation model inspired by item-response theory followed by expert review to derive high-quality ground truth. CleanPatrick formalizes issue detection as a ranking task and employs standard ranking metrics that mirror real audit workflows. We benchmark classical anomaly detectors, perceptual hashing, SSIM, Confident Learning, NoiseRank, FINE, BHN, and SelfClean. On CleanPatrick, self-supervised representations excel at near-duplicate detection, classical methods achieve competitive off-topic detection under constrained review budgets, and detecting implausible labels under conservative human judgment remains challenging for fine-grained medical classification. By releasing both the dataset and the evaluation framework, CleanPatrick enables a systematic comparison of image-cleaning strategies.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2025.

Builds on

26 of 47 references.

References · 26

  1. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  2. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  3. 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 4,053
  4. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
  5. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
  6. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 395
  7. 2018Pyro: Deep Universal Probabilistic Programmingcited by 380
  8. 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 235
  9. 2021Evaluating Deep Neural Networks Trained on Clinical Images in Dermatology with the Fitzpatrick 17k Datasetcited by 185
  10. 2022ECOD: Unsupervised Outlier Detection Using Empirical Cumulative Distribution Functionscited by 153
  11. 2021Watermarking Images in Self-Supervised Latent Spacescited by 94
  12. 2022Deep Isolation Forest for Anomaly Detectioncited by 92
14 more
  1. 2022DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI Developmentcited by 90
  2. 2021FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 82
  3. 2022DC-BENCH: Dataset Condensation Benchmarkcited by 67
  4. 2024A Multimodal Vision Foundation Model for Clinical Dermatologycited by 50
  5. 2023SkinCon: A skin disease dataset densely annotated by domain experts for fine-grained model debugging and analysiscited by 44
  6. 2020NoiseRank: Unsupervised Label Noise Reduction with Dependence Modelscited by 20
  7. 2023AQuA: A Benchmarking Tool for Label Quality Assessmentcited by 16
  8. 2023REIN: A Comprehensive Benchmark Framework for Data Cleaning Methods in ML Pipelinescited by 10
  9. 2019Handling Inter-Annotator Agreement for Automated Skin Lesion Segmentationcited by 9
  10. 2023Intrinsic Self-Supervision for Data Quality Auditscited by 8
  11. 2024Investigating the Quality of DermaMNIST and Fitzpatrick17k Dermatological Image Datasetscited by 7
  12. 2023Towards Reliable Dermatology Evaluation Benchmarkscited by 6
  13. 2019Benchmarking unsupervised near-duplicate image detectioncited by 5
  14. 2025Revisiting Automatic Data Curation for Vision Foundation Models in Digital Pathologycited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.