mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Revisiting Automatic Data Curation for Vision Foundation Models in Digital Pathology

arXiv 2503.18709 ↗First posted 24 Mar 2025cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision foundation models (FMs) are accelerating the development of digital pathology algorithms and transforming biomedical research. These models learn, in a self-supervised manner, to represent histological features in highly heterogeneous tiles extracted from whole-slide images (WSIs) of real-world patient samples. The performance of these FMs is significantly influenced by the size, diversity, and balance of the pre-training data. However, data selection has been primarily guided by expert knowledge at the WSI level, focusing on factors such as disease classification and tissue types, while largely overlooking the granular details available at the tile level. In this paper, we investigate the potential of unsupervised automatic data curation at the tile-level, taking into account 350 million tiles. Specifically, we apply hierarchical clustering trees to pre-extracted tile embeddings, allowing us to sample balanced datasets uniformly across the embedding space of the pretrained FM. We further identify these datasets are subject to a trade-off between size and balance, potentially compromising the quality of representations learned by FMs, and propose tailored batch sampling strategies to mitigate this effect. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method through improved performance on a diverse range of clinically relevant downstream tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2025.

Builds on

19 of 26 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  3. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  4. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  5. 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,095
  6. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 678
  7. 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
  8. 2021BRACS: A Dataset for BReAst Carcinoma Subtyping in H&E Histology Imagescited by 132
  9. 2018BACH: Grand Challenge on Breast Cancer Histology Imagescited by 131
  10. 2023CellViT: Vision Transformers for Precise Cell Segmentation and Classificationcited by 108
  11. 2023Virchow: A Million-Slide Digital Pathology Foundation Modelcited by 90
  12. 2017Deep Active Learning over the Long Tailcited by 84
7 more
  1. 2024Automatic Data Curation for Self-Supervised Learning: A Clustering-Based Approachcited by 50
  2. 2021Hard Sample Aware Noise Robust Learning for Histopathology Image Classificationcited by 48
  3. 2024RudolfV: A Foundation Model by Pathologists for Pathologistscited by 41
  4. 2022WSSS4LUAD: Grand Challenge on Weakly-supervised Tissue Semantic Segmentation for Lung Adenocarcinomacited by 36
  5. 2021UniToPatho, a labeled histopathological dataset for colorectal polyps classification and adenoma dysplasia gradingcited by 33
  6. 2022Active Learning Strategies for Weakly-supervised Object Detectioncited by 17
  7. 2024Benchmarking Embedding Aggregation Methods in Computational Pathology: A Clinical Data Perspectivecited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.