mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Understanding Gen Alpha Digital Language: Evaluation of LLM Safety Systems for Content Moderation

arXiv 2505.10588 ↗First posted 14 May 2025cs.CY cs.AI cs.CLcited by 5

On the map: LLM safety and security → Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails

Abstract (arXiv)

This research offers a unique evaluation of how AI systems interpret the digital language of Generation Alpha (Gen Alpha, born 2010-2024). As the first cohort raised alongside AI, Gen Alpha faces new forms of online risk due to immersive digital engagement and a growing mismatch between their evolving communication and existing safety tools. Their distinct language, shaped by gaming, memes, and AI-driven trends, often conceals harmful interactions from both human moderators and automated systems. We assess four leading AI models (GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, and Llama 3) on their ability to detect masked harassment and manipulation within Gen Alpha discourse. Using a dataset of 100 recent expressions from gaming platforms, social media, and video content, the study reveals critical comprehension failures with direct implications for online safety. This work contributes: (1) a first-of-its-kind dataset capturing Gen Alpha expressions; (2) a framework to improve AI moderation systems for youth protection; (3) a multi-perspective evaluation including AI systems, human moderators, and parents, with direct input from Gen Alpha co-researchers; and (4) an analysis of how linguistic divergence increases youth vulnerability. Findings highlight the urgent need to redesign safety systems attuned to youth communication, especially given Gen Alpha reluctance to seek help when adults fail to understand their digital world. This study combines the insight of a Gen Alpha researcher with systematic academic analysis to address critical digital safety challenges.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 7 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2025.

Builds on

7 of 35 references.

References · 7

  1. 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 639
  2. 2024SLANG: New Concept Comprehension of Large Language Modelscited by 20
  3. 2022Slangvolution: A Causal Analysis of Semantic Change and Frequency Dynamics in Slangcited by 15
  4. 2024Algorithmic Arbitrariness in Content Moderationcited by 13
  5. 2024Toward Informal Language Processing: Knowledge of Slang in Large Language Modelscited by 6
  6. 2022Tracing Semantic Variation in Slangcited by 3
  7. 2024Role Identification based Method for Cyberbullying Analysis in Social Edge Computingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025SproutBench: A Benchmark for Safe and Ethical Large Language Models for Youth
  2. 2025Safe-Child-LLM: A Developmental Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Safety in Child-LLM Interactions
  3. 2026CR4T: Rewrite-Based Guardrails for Adolescent LLM Safety
  4. 2025Guardians and Offenders: A Survey on Harmful Content Generation and Safety Mitigation of LLM
  5. 2025A Proposal for Evaluating the Operational Risk for ChatBots based on Large Language Models
  6. 2025Can LLMs Threaten Human Survival? Benchmarking Potential Existential Threats from LLMs via Prefix Completion
  7. 2024Exploring Parent-Child Perceptions on Safety in Generative AI: Concerns, Mitigation Strategies, and Design Implications
  8. 2024AI Safety in Generative AI Large Language Models: A Survey