Fixing Incomplete Value Function Decomposition for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Value function decomposition methods for cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning compose joint values from individual per-agent utilities, and train them using a joint objective. To ensure that the action selection process between individual utilities and joint values remains consistent, it is imperative for the composition to satisfy the individual-global max (IGM) property. Although satisfying IGM itself is straightforward, most existing methods (e.g., VDN, QMIX) have limited representation capabilities and are unable to represent the full class of IGM values, and the one exception that has no such limitation (QPLEX) is unnecessarily complex. In this work, we present a simple formulation of the full class of IGM values that naturally leads to the derivation of QFIX, a novel family of value function decomposition models that expand the representation capabilities of prior models by means of a thin "fixing" layer. We derive multiple variants of QFIX, and implement three variants in two well-known multi-agent frameworks. We perform an empirical evaluation on multiple SMACv2 and Overcooked environments, which confirms that QFIX (i) succeeds in enhancing the performance of prior methods, (ii) learns more stably and performs better than its main competitor QPLEX, and (iii) achieves this while employing the simplest and smallest mixing models.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2025.
Builds on
14 of 24 references.
References · 14
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
- 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 807
- 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 785
- 2019On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyondcited by 772
- 2017Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learningcited by 503
- 2020Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 485
- 2019QTRAN: Learning to Factorize with Transformation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 379
- 2019On the Utility of Learning about Humans for Human-AI Coordinationcited by 349
- 2020QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learningcited by 270
- 2020Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 197
- 2022SMACv2: An Improved Benchmark for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 122
- 2023JaxMARL: Multi-Agent RL Environments and Algorithms in JAXcited by 63
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Retaining Suboptimal Actions to Follow Shifting Optima in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Beyond Monotonicity: Revisiting Factorization Principles in Multi-Agent Q-Learning
- 2024Mixed Q-Functionals: Advancing Value-Based Methods in Cooperative MARL with Continuous Action Domains
- 2026QSIM: Mitigating Overestimation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning via Action Similarity Weighted Q-Learning
- 2022Rethinking Individual Global Max in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Distributed Value Decomposition Networks with Networked Agents
- 2024QTypeMix: Enhancing Multi-Agent Cooperative Strategies through Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Value Decomposition
- 2023VDFD: Multi-Agent Value Decomposition Framework with Disentangled World Model