mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

XRAG: Cross-lingual Retrieval-Augmented Generation

arXiv 2505.10089 ↗First posted 15 May 2025cs.CLcited by 9

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Generation and context integration

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose XRAG, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the generation abilities of LLMs in cross-lingual Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) settings where the user language does not match the retrieval results. XRAG is constructed from recent news articles to ensure that its questions require external knowledge to be answered. It covers the real-world scenarios of monolingual and multilingual retrieval, and provides relevancy annotations for each retrieved document. Our novel dataset construction pipeline results in questions that require complex reasoning, as evidenced by the significant gap between human and LLM performance. Consequently, XRAG serves as a valuable benchmark for studying LLM reasoning abilities, even before considering the additional cross-lingual complexity. Experimental results on five LLMs uncover two previously unreported challenges in cross-lingual RAG: 1) in the monolingual retrieval setting, all evaluated models struggle with response language correctness; 2) in the multilingual retrieval setting, the main challenge lies in reasoning over retrieved information across languages rather than generation of non-English text.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Generation and context integration, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 23 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2025.

Builds on

23 of 44 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks22 May

Other references · 22

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  2. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  3. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  4. 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,800
  5. 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,050
  6. 2018XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representationscited by 913
  7. 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 719
  8. 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 651
  9. 2023FreshLLMs: Refreshing Large Language Models with Search Engine Augmentationcited by 308
  10. 2023MEGA: Multilingual Evaluation of Generative AIcited by 291
  11. 2024MultiHop-RAG: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Multi-Hop Queriescited by 253
  12. 2022RealTime QA: What's the Answer Right Now?cited by 239
10 more
  1. 2017Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documentscited by 190
  2. 2020XOR QA: Cross-lingual Open-Retrieval Question Answeringcited by 121
  3. 2020LAReQA: Language-agnostic answer retrieval from a multilingual poolcited by 41
  4. 2025The Amazon Nova Family of Models: Technical Report and Model Cardcited by 41
  5. 2024RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Frameworkcited by 39
  6. 2022A Survey on Cross-Lingual Summarizationcited by 38
  7. 2021Lexicon Enhanced Chinese Sequence Labeling Using BERT Adaptercited by 34
  8. 2024MIRAGE-Bench: Automatic Multilingual Benchmark Arena for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systemscited by 14
  9. 2023"Knowing When You Don't Know": A Multilingual Relevance Assessment Dataset for Robust Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 12
  10. 2024Learning When to Retrieve, What to Rewrite, and How to Respond in Conversational QAcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 6.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Multilingual Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive Task
  2. 2025On the Consistency of Multilingual Context Utilization in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  3. 2025The Cross-Lingual Cost: Retrieval Biases in RAG over Arabic-English Corpora
  4. 2025When Retrieval Succeeds and Fails: Rethinking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for LLMs
  5. 2024LongRAG: A Dual-Perspective Retrieval-Augmented Generation Paradigm for Long-Context Question Answering
  6. 2025Towards Global Retrieval Augmented Generation: A Benchmark for Corpus-Level Reasoning
  7. 2026All Languages Matter: Understanding and Mitigating Language Bias in Multilingual RAG
  8. 2024Fact, Fetch, and Reason: A Unified Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation