SHAP-based Explanations are Sensitive to Feature Representation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Local feature-based explanations are a key component of the XAI toolkit. These explanations compute feature importance values relative to an ``interpretable'' feature representation. In tabular data, feature values themselves are often considered interpretable. This paper examines the impact of data engineering choices on local feature-based explanations. We demonstrate that simple, common data engineering techniques, such as representing age with a histogram or encoding race in a specific way, can manipulate feature importance as determined by popular methods like SHAP. Notably, the sensitivity of explanations to feature representation can be exploited by adversaries to obscure issues like discrimination. While the intuition behind these results is straightforward, their systematic exploration has been lacking. Previous work has focused on adversarial attacks on feature-based explainers by biasing data or manipulating models. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating that explainers can be misled by standard, seemingly innocuous data engineering techniques.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2025.
Builds on
11 of 42 references.
References · 11
- 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 443
- 2019Explainable Machine Learning in Deploymentcited by 211
- 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 147
- 2019The Hidden Assumptions Behind Counterfactual Explanations and Principal Reasonscited by 115
- 2020Principles and Practice of Explainable Machine Learningcited by 99
- 2022Towards Intersectionality in Machine Learning: Including More Identities, Handling Underrepresentation, and Performing Evaluationcited by 59
- 2018Racial categories in machine learningcited by 48
- 2021Rational Shapley Valuescited by 18
- 2023A Critical Survey on Fairness Benefits of Explainable AIcited by 16
- 2021Epistemic values in feature importance methods: Lessons from feminist epistemologycited by 11
- 2024How should AI decisions be explained? Requirements for Explanations from the Perspective of European Lawcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2026Explanation Multiplicity in SHAP: Characterization and Assessmentcited by 5
- 2026ExplainerPFN: Towards tabular foundation models for model-free zero-shot feature importance estimationscited by 5
- 2025Tractable Shapley Values and Interactions via Tensor Networkscited by 2
- 2026We Need Explanation Cards to Connect Explanation Algorithms to the Real Worldcited by 0
- 2026We Need Explanation Cards to Connect Explanation Algorithms to the Real World15 Jun 2026
- 2026ExplainerPFN: Towards tabular foundation models for model-free zero-shot feature importance estimations30 Jan 2026
- 2026Explanation Multiplicity in SHAP: Characterization and Assessment19 Jan 2026
- 2025Tractable Shapley Values and Interactions via Tensor Networks25 Oct 2025