mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Investigating Robotaxi Crash Severity with Geographical Random Forest and the Urban Environment

arXiv 2505.06762 ↗First posted 10 May 2025cs.LG cs.ROcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper quantitatively investigates the crash severity of Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) with spatially localized machine learning and macroscopic measures of the urban built environment. Extending beyond the microscopic effects of individual infrastructure elements, we focus on the city-scale land use and behavioral patterns, while addressing spatial heterogeneity and spatial autocorrelation. We implemented a spatially localized machine learning technique called Geographical Random Forest (GRF) on the California AV collision dataset. Analyzing multiple urban measures, including points of interest, building footprint, and land use, we built a GRF model and visualized it as a crash severity risk map of San Francisco. This paper presents three findings. First, spatially localized machine learning outperformed regular machine learning in predicting AV crash severity. The bias-variance tradeoff was evident as we adjusted the localization weight hyperparameter. Second, land use was the most important predictor, compared to intersections, building footprints, public transit stops, and Points Of Interest (POIs). Third, AV crashes were more likely to result in low-severity incidents in city center areas with greater diversity and commercial activities, than in residential neighborhoods. Residential land use is likely associated with higher severity due to human behavior and less restrictive environments. Counterintuitively, residential areas were associated with higher crash severity, compared to more complex areas such as commercial and mixed-use areas. When robotaxi operators train their AV systems, it is recommended to: (1) consider where their fleet operates and make localized algorithms for their perception system, and (2) design safety measures specific to residential neighborhoods, such as slower driving speeds and more alert sensors.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2025.

Builds on

3 of 82 references.

References · 3

  1. 2015The social dilemma of autonomous vehiclescited by 48
  2. 2025Characteristics Analysis of Autonomous Vehicle Pre-crash Scenarioscited by 8
  3. 2024PyGRF: An improved Python Geographical Random Forest model and case studies in public health and natural disasterscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.