Adaptive Token Boundaries: Integrating Human Chunking Mechanisms into Multimodal LLMs
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advancements in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in processing diverse data types, yet significant disparities persist between human cognitive processes and computational approaches to multimodal information integration. This research presents a systematic investigation into the parallels between human cross-modal chunking mechanisms and token representation methodologies in MLLMs. Through empirical studies comparing human performance patterns with model behaviors across visual-linguistic tasks, we demonstrate that conventional static tokenization schemes fundamentally constrain current models' capacity to simulate the dynamic, context-sensitive nature of human information processing. We propose a novel framework for dynamic cross-modal tokenization that incorporates adaptive boundaries, hierarchical representations, and alignment mechanisms grounded in cognitive science principles. Quantitative evaluations demonstrate that our approach yields statistically significant improvements over state-of-the-art models on benchmark tasks (+7.8% on Visual Question Answering, +5.3% on Complex Scene Description) while exhibiting more human-aligned error patterns and attention distributions. These findings contribute to the theoretical understanding of the relationship between human cognition and artificial intelligence, while providing empirical evidence for developing more cognitively plausible AI systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 14 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2025.
Builds on
14 of 32 references.
References · 14
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
- 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,288
- 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,905
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
- 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,462
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
- 2018MINE: Mutual Information Neural Estimationcited by 683
- 2018Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisalcited by 217
2 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024A Survey on Multimodal Benchmarks: In the Era of Large AI Models
- 2026TokenSwap: Benchmarking and Reducing the Modality Gap in Multimodal LLMs
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey and Guide to Multimodal Large Language Models in Vision-Language Tasks
- 2025How Multimodal LLMs Solve Image Tasks: A Lens on Visual Grounding, Task Reasoning, and Answer Decoding
- 2024Explainable and Interpretable Multimodal Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
- 2024Cross-modal Information Flow in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2024A Comprehensive Review of Multimodal Large Language Models: Performance and Challenges Across Different Tasks
- 2025On Path to Multimodal Generalist: General-Level and General-Bench