EvalxNLP: A Framework for Benchmarking Post-Hoc Explainability Methods on NLP Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As Natural Language Processing (NLP) models continue to evolve and become integral to high-stakes applications, ensuring their interpretability remains a critical challenge. Given the growing variety of explainability methods and diverse stakeholder requirements, frameworks that help stakeholders select appropriate explanations tailored to their specific use cases are increasingly important. To address this need, we introduce EvalxNLP, a Python framework for benchmarking state-of-the-art feature attribution methods for transformer-based NLP models. EvalxNLP integrates eight widely recognized explainability techniques from the Explainable AI (XAI) literature, enabling users to generate and evaluate explanations based on key properties such as faithfulness, plausibility, and complexity. Our framework also provides interactive, LLM-based textual explanations, facilitating user understanding of the generated explanations and evaluation outcomes. Human evaluation results indicate high user satisfaction with EvalxNLP, suggesting it is a promising framework for benchmarking explanation methods across diverse user groups. By offering a user-friendly and extensible platform, EvalxNLP aims at democratizing explainability tools and supporting the systematic comparison and advancement of XAI techniques in NLP.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2025.
Builds on
28 of 33 references.
References · 28
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
- 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 530
- 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
- 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 407
- 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 310
- 2020Evaluating and Aggregating Feature-based Model Explanationscited by 188
- 2022Quantus: An Explainable AI Toolkit for Responsible Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations and Beyondcited by 171
16 more
- 2020A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classificationcited by 159
- 2022OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanationscited by 126
- 2021XLM-T: Multilingual Language Models in Twitter for Sentiment Analysis and Beyondcited by 114
- 2023Inseq: An Interpretability Toolkit for Sequence Generation Modelscited by 78
- 2021Synthetic Benchmarks for Scientific Research in Explainable Machine Learningcited by 59
- 2023SHAP-IQ: Unified Approximation of any-order Shapley Interactionscited by 51
- 2024shapiq: Shapley Interactions for Machine Learningcited by 43
- 2023Using Captum to Explain Generative Language Modelscited by 33
- 2022ferret: a Framework for Benchmarking Explainers on Transformerscited by 26
- 2022On the Impact of Temporal Concept Drift on Model Explanationscited by 14
- 2023Incorporating Attribution Importance for Improving Faithfulness Metricscited by 14
- 2022Saliency Map Verbalization: Comparing Feature Importance Representations from Model-free and Instruction-based Methodscited by 13
- 2024BEExAI: Benchmark to Evaluate Explainable AIcited by 11
- 2021AI Explainability 360: Impact and Designcited by 8
- 2024Attention Mechanisms Don't Learn Additive Models: Rethinking Feature Importance for Transformerscited by 8
- 2022Doctor XAvIer: Explainable Diagnosis on Physician-Patient Dialogues and XAI Evaluationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.