BEExAI: Benchmark to Evaluate Explainable AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent research in explainability has given rise to numerous post-hoc attribution methods aimed at enhancing our comprehension of the outputs of black-box machine learning models. However, evaluating the quality of explanations lacks a cohesive approach and a consensus on the methodology for deriving quantitative metrics that gauge the efficacy of explainability post-hoc attribution methods. Furthermore, with the development of increasingly complex deep learning models for diverse data applications, the need for a reliable way of measuring the quality and correctness of explanations is becoming critical. We address this by proposing BEExAI, a benchmark tool that allows large-scale comparison of different post-hoc XAI methods, employing a set of selected evaluation metrics.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2024.
Builds on
27 of 42 references.
References · 27
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
- 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 542
- 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
15 more
- 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 310
- 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 309
- 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 299
- 2016Rationalizing Neural Predictionscited by 281
- 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 279
- 2020Evaluating and Aggregating Feature-based Model Explanationscited by 185
- 2022Quantus: An Explainable AI Toolkit for Responsible Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations and Beyondcited by 171
- 2017OpenML Benchmarking Suitescited by 169
- 2020A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classificationcited by 158
- 2022OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanationscited by 125
- 2023Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) 2.0: A Manifesto of Open Challenges and Interdisciplinary Research Directionscited by 123
- 2021The Out-of-Distribution Problem in Explainability and Search Methods for Feature Importance Explanationscited by 86
- 2021Synthetic Benchmarks for Scientific Research in Explainable Machine Learningcited by 59
- 2021Software for Dataset-wide XAI: From Local Explanations to Global Insights with Zennit, CoRelAy, and ViRelAycited by 53
- 2022BASED-XAI: Breaking Ablation Studies Down for Explainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 7; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2025Explainability in Practice: A Survey of Explainable NLP Across Various Domainscited by 11
- 2025Which LIME should I trust? Concepts, Challenges, and Solutionscited by 7
- 2025Gender Bias in Explainability: Investigating Performance Disparity in Post-hoc Methodscited by 3
- 2024DLBacktrace: A Model Agnostic Explainability for any Deep Learning Modelscited by 2
- 2025EvalxNLP: A Framework for Benchmarking Post-Hoc Explainability Methods on NLP Modelscited by 2
- 2025Attribution Explanations for Deep Neural Networks: A Theoretical Perspectivecited by 2
- 2025From Confusion to Clarity: ProtoScore -- A Framework for Evaluating Prototype-Based XAIcited by 2
- 2024EXAGREE: Mitigating Explanation Disagreement with Stakeholder-Aligned Modelscited by 0
- 2024A Multilingual Sentiment Lexicon for Low-Resource Language Translation using Large Languages Models and Explainable AIcited by 0
- 2025Application of integrated gradients explainability to sociopsychological semantic markerscited by 0
- 2026A Comparative Explainability Framework for DeBERTa-v3 in Zero-Shot Medical Abstract Classificationcited by 0
- 2026A Comparative Explainability Framework for DeBERTa-v3 in Zero-Shot Medical Abstract Classification1 Oct 2026
- 2025From Confusion to Clarity: ProtoScore -- A Framework for Evaluating Prototype-Based XAI11 Nov 2025
- 2025Attribution Explanations for Deep Neural Networks: A Theoretical Perspective11 Aug 2025
- 2025EvalxNLP: A Framework for Benchmarking Post-Hoc Explainability Methods on NLP Models2 May 2025
- 2025Gender Bias in Explainability: Investigating Performance Disparity in Post-hoc Methods2 May 2025
- 2025Which LIME should I trust? Concepts, Challenges, and Solutions31 Mar 2025
- 2025Application of integrated gradients explainability to sociopsychological semantic markers6 Mar 2025
- 2025Explainability in Practice: A Survey of Explainable NLP Across Various Domains2 Feb 2025
- 2024DLBacktrace: A Model Agnostic Explainability for any Deep Learning Models19 Nov 2024
- 2024A Multilingual Sentiment Lexicon for Low-Resource Language Translation using Large Languages Models and Explainable AI6 Nov 2024
- 2024EXAGREE: Mitigating Explanation Disagreement with Stakeholder-Aligned Models4 Nov 2024