Optimizing Hard Thresholding for Sparse Model Discovery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many model selection algorithms rely on sparse dictionary learning to provide interpretable and physics-based governing equations. The optimization algorithms typically use a hard thresholding process to enforce sparse activations in the model coefficients by removing library elements from consideration. By introducing an annealing scheme that reactivates a fraction of the removed terms with a cooling schedule, we are able to improve the performance of these sparse learning algorithms. We concentrate on two approaches to the optimization, SINDy, and an alternative using hard thresholding pursuit. We see in both cases that annealing can improve model accuracy. The effectiveness of annealing is demonstrated through comparisons on several nonlinear systems pulled from convective flows, excitable systems, and population dynamics. Finally we apply these algorithms to experimental data for projectile motion.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2025.
Builds on
24 of 43 references.
References · 24
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
- 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
- 2021Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A reviewcited by 473
- 2017PDE-Net: Learning PDEs from Datacited by 311
- 2020Weak SINDy For Partial Differential Equationscited by 155
- 2021Ensemble-SINDy: Robust sparse model discovery in the low-data, high-noise limit, with active learning and controlcited by 137
- 2021Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modellingcited by 88
- 2017Sparse learning of stochastic dynamic equationscited by 76
- 2023A Mathematical Guide to Operator Learningcited by 76
- 2017Extracting Sparse High-Dimensional Dynamics from Limited Datacited by 50
- 2018On the Convergence of the SINDy Algorithmcited by 49
12 more
- 2020Bridging Physics-based and Data-driven modeling for Learning Dynamical Systemscited by 25
- 2022Bayesian autoencoders for data-driven discovery of coordinates, governing equations and fundamental constantscited by 24
- 2020Numerical differentiation of noisy data: A unifying multi-objective optimization frameworkcited by 20
- 2022A Review of Data-Driven Discovery for Dynamic Systemscited by 18
- 2021SINDy with Control: A Tutorialcited by 15
- 2024ADAM-SINDy: An Efficient Optimization Framework for Parameterized Nonlinear Dynamical System Identificationcited by 11
- 2022Random Feature Models for Learning Interacting Dynamical Systemscited by 10
- 2024Time-Series Forecasting, Knowledge Distillation, and Refinement within a Multimodal PDE Foundation Modelcited by 7
- 2024BINDy -- Bayesian identification of nonlinear dynamics with reversible-jump Markov-chain Monte-Carlocited by 6
- 2024Statistical Mechanics of Dynamical System Identificationcited by 5
- 2023Multiphysics discovery with moving boundaries using Ensemble SINDy and Peridynamic Differential Operatorcited by 3
- 2022The risk of bias in denoising methodscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.