Newton-Puiseux Analysis for Interpretability and Calibration of Complex-Valued Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Complex-valued neural networks (CVNNs) are particularly suitable for handling phase-sensitive signals, including electrocardiography (ECG), radar/sonar, and wireless in-phase/quadrature (I/Q) streams. Nevertheless, their interpretability and probability calibration remain insufficiently investigated. In this work, we present a Newton--Puiseux framework that examines the local decision geometry of a trained CVNN by (i) fitting a small, kink-aware polynomial surrogate to the logit difference in the vicinity of uncertain inputs, and (ii) factorizing this surrogate using Newton--Puiseux expansions to derive analytic branch descriptors, including exponents, multiplicities, and orientations. These descriptors provide phase-aligned directions that induce class flips in the original network and allow for a straightforward, multiplicity-guided temperature adjustment for improved calibration. We outline assumptions and diagnostic measures under which the surrogate proves informative and characterize potential failure modes arising from piecewise-holomorphic activations (e.g., modReLU). Our phase-aware analysis identifies sensitive directions and enhances Expected Calibration Error in two case studies beyond a controlled C2 synthetic benchmark -- namely, the MIT--BIH arrhythmia (ECG) dataset and RadioML 2016.10a (wireless modulation) -- when compared to uncalibrated softmax and standard post-hoc baselines. We also present confidence intervals, non-parametric tests, and quantify sensitivity to inaccuracies in estimating branch multiplicity. Crucially, this method requires no modifications to the architecture and applies to any CVNN with complex logits transformed to real moduli.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2025.
Builds on
15 of 43 references.
References · 15
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 390
- 2014On the Number of Linear Regions of Deep Neural Networkscited by 381
- 2017Methods for Interpreting and Understanding Deep Neural Networkscited by 345
- 2015Unitary Evolution Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 294
- 2016Convolutional Radio Modulation Recognition Networkscited by 106
- 2019Phase-aware Speech Enhancement with Deep Complex U-Netcited by 73
- 2024Confidence Calibration of Classifiers with Many Classescited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.