mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep learning for full-field ultrasonic characterization

arXiv 2301.02378 ↗First posted 6 Jan 2023math.NA cs.LG cs.NAcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study takes advantage of recent advances in machine learning to establish a physics-based data analytic platform for distributed reconstruction of mechanical properties in layered components from full waveform data. In this vein, two logics, namely the direct inversion and physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), are explored. The direct inversion entails three steps: (i) spectral denoising and differentiation of the full-field data, (ii) building appropriate neural maps to approximate the profile of unknown physical and regularization parameters on their respective domains, and (iii) simultaneous training of the neural networks by minimizing the Tikhonov-regularized PDE loss using data from (i). PINNs furnish efficient surrogate models of complex systems with predictive capabilities via multitask learning where the field variables are modeled by neural maps endowed with (scaler or distributed) auxiliary parameters such as physical unknowns and loss function weights. PINNs are then trained by minimizing a measure of data misfit subject to the underlying physical laws as constraints. In this study, to facilitate learning from ultrasonic data, the PINNs loss adopts (a) wavenumber-dependent Sobolev norms to compute the data misfit, and (b) non-adaptive weights in a specific scaling framework to naturally balance the loss objectives by leveraging the form of PDEs germane to elastic-wave propagation. Both paradigms are examined via synthetic and laboratory test data. In the latter case, the reconstructions are performed at multiple frequencies and the results are verified by a set of complementary experiments highlighting the importance of verification and validation in data-driven modeling.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2023.

Builds on

11 of 56 references.

References · 11

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 834
  3. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
  4. 2020Self-Adaptive Physics-Informed Neural Networks using a Soft Attention Mechanismcited by 233
  5. 2021Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problemscited by 222
  6. 2021Multi-Objective Loss Balancing for Physics-Informed Deep Learningcited by 87
  7. 2021Improved architectures and training algorithms for deep operator networkscited by 86
  8. 2020A fast and accurate physics-informed neural network reduced order model with shallow masked autoencodercited by 80
  9. 2020A Dual-Dimer Method for Training Physics-Constrained Neural Networks with Minimax Architecturecited by 50
  10. 2021Physics informed neural networks for continuum micromechanicscited by 46
  11. 2022A Physics-Guided Neural Operator Learning Approach to Model Biological Tissues from Digital Image Correlation Measurementscited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

5 papers.