Graph of Attacks: Improved Black-Box and Interpretable Jailbreaks for LLMs
On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking
Abstract (arXiv)
The challenge of ensuring Large Language Models (LLMs) align with societal standards is of increasing interest, as these models are still prone to adversarial jailbreaks that bypass their safety mechanisms. Identifying these vulnerabilities is crucial for enhancing the robustness of LLMs against such exploits. We propose Graph of ATtacks (GoAT), a method for generating adversarial prompts to test the robustness of LLM alignment using the Graph of Thoughts framework [Besta et al., 2024]. GoAT excels at generating highly effective jailbreak prompts with fewer queries to the victim model than state-of-the-art attacks, achieving up to five times better jailbreak success rate against robust models like Llama. Notably, GoAT creates high-quality, human-readable prompts without requiring access to the targeted model's parameters, making it a black-box attack. Unlike approaches constrained by tree-based reasoning, GoAT's reasoning is based on a more intricate graph structure. By making simultaneous attack paths aware of each other's progress, this dynamic framework allows a deeper integration and refinement of reasoning paths, significantly enhancing the collaborative exploration of adversarial vulnerabilities in LLMs. At a technical level, GoAT starts with a graph structure and iteratively refines it by combining and improving thoughts, enabling synergy between different thought paths. The code for our implementation can be found at: https://github.com/GoAT-pydev/Graph_of_Attacks.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 27 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2025.
Builds on
27 of 34 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Graph of Attacks with Pruning: Optimizing Stealthy Jailbreak Prompt Generation for Enhanced LLM Content Moderation28 Jan
- 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMs12 Jan
- 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automatically4 Dec
- 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Models3 Oct
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?5 Jul
Other references · 21
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
- 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
- 2023Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Modelscited by 873
- 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 709
- 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 628
- 2023Role-Play with Large Language Modelscited by 290
9 more
- 2023Exploiting Programmatic Behavior of LLMs: Dual-Use Through Standard Security Attackscited by 268
- 2021Gradient-based Adversarial Attacks against Text Transformerscited by 233
- 2023Automatically Auditing Large Language Models via Discrete Optimizationcited by 187
- 2019Build it Break it Fix it for Dialogue Safety: Robustness from Adversarial Human Attackcited by 176
- 2018The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigationcited by 159
- 2021A Recipe For Arbitrary Text Style Transfer with Large Language Modelscited by 107
- 2021Globally-Robust Neural Networkscited by 106
- 2025H-CoT: Hijacking the Chain-of-Thought Safety Reasoning Mechanism to Jailbreak Large Reasoning Models, Including OpenAI o1/o3, DeepSeek-R1, and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinkingcited by 94
- 2023Thorny Roses: Investigating the Dual Use Dilemma in Natural Language Processingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey
- 2025Paper Summary Attack: Jailbreaking LLMs through LLM Safety Papers
- 2024JailBreakV: A Benchmark for Assessing the Robustness of MultiModal Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks
- 2024Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via Layer-specific Editing
- 2026The Art of the Jailbreak: Formulating Jailbreak Attacks for LLM Security Beyond Binary Scoring
- 2026MultiBreak: A Scalable and Diverse Multi-turn Jailbreak Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Safety
- 2023Defending Against Alignment-Breaking Attacks via Robustly Aligned LLM
- 2025Adversarial Reasoning at Jailbreaking Time