Conformal Segmentation in Industrial Surface Defect Detection with Statistical Guarantees
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In industrial settings, surface defects on steel can significantly compromise its service life and elevate potential safety risks. Traditional defect detection methods predominantly rely on manual inspection, which suffers from low efficiency and high costs. Although automated defect detection approaches based on Convolutional Neural Networks(e.g., Mask R-CNN) have advanced rapidly, their reliability remains challenged due to data annotation uncertainties during deep model training and overfitting issues. These limitations may lead to detection deviations when processing the given new test samples, rendering automated detection processes unreliable. To address this challenge, we first evaluate the detection model's practical performance through calibration data that satisfies the independent and identically distributed (i.i.d) condition with test data. Specifically, we define a loss function for each calibration sample to quantify detection error rates, such as the complement of recall rate and false discovery rate. Subsequently, we derive a statistically rigorous threshold based on a user-defined risk level to identify high-probability defective pixels in test images, thereby constructing prediction sets (e.g., defect regions). This methodology ensures that the expected error rate (mean error rate) on the test set remains strictly bounced by the predefined risk level. Additionally, we observe a negative correlation between the average prediction set size and the risk level on the test set, establishing a statistically rigorous metric for assessing detection model uncertainty. Furthermore, our study demonstrates robust and efficient control over the expected test set error rate across varying calibration-to-test partitioning ratios, validating the method's adaptability and operational effectiveness.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2025.
Builds on
16 of 26 references.
References · 16
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
- 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
- 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,132
- 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
- 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
- 2022Conformal prediction beyond exchangeabilitycited by 348
- 2022Conformal Risk Controlcited by 290
- 2024ConU: Conformal Uncertainty in Large Language Models with Correctness Coverage Guaranteescited by 62
- 2023Confident Object Detection via Conformal Prediction and Conformal Risk Control: an Application to Railway Signalingcited by 22
- 2025SConU: Selective Conformal Uncertainty in Large Language Modelscited by 21
- 2024Conformal Semantic Image Segmentation: Post-hoc Quantification of Predictive Uncertaintycited by 19
4 more
- 2024Word-Sequence Entropy: Towards Uncertainty Estimation in Free-Form Medical Question Answering Applications and Beyondcited by 18
- 2024Sample then Identify: A General Framework for Risk Control and Assessment in Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 18
- 2024GhostNetV3: Exploring the Training Strategies for Compact Modelscited by 14
- 2024Conformal Risk Control for Pulmonary Nodule Detectioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.