Evaluating and Mitigating Bias in AI-Based Medical Text Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems, particularly those based on deep learning models, have increasingly achieved expert-level performance in medical applications. However, there is growing concern that such AI systems may reflect and amplify human bias, and reduce the quality of their performance in historically under-served populations. The fairness issue has attracted considerable research interest in the medical imaging classification field, yet it remains understudied in the text generation domain. In this study, we investigate the fairness problem in text generation within the medical field and observe significant performance discrepancies across different races, sexes, and age groups, including intersectional groups, various model scales, and different evaluation metrics. To mitigate this fairness issue, we propose an algorithm that selectively optimizes those underperformed groups to reduce bias. The selection rules take into account not only word-level accuracy but also the pathology accuracy to the target reference, while ensuring that the entire process remains fully differentiable for effective model training. Our evaluations across multiple backbones, datasets, and modalities demonstrate that our proposed algorithm enhances fairness in text generation without compromising overall performance. Specifically, the disparities among various groups across different metrics were diminished by more than 30% with our algorithm, while the relative change in text generation accuracy was typically within 2%. By reducing the bias generated by deep learning models, our proposed approach can potentially alleviate concerns about the fairness and reliability of text generation diagnosis in medical domain. Our code is publicly available to facilitate further research at https://github.com/iriscxy/GenFair.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2025.
Builds on
30 of 63 references.
References · 30
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,423
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 966
- 2019MIMIC-CXR-JPG, a large publicly available database of labeled chest radiographscited by 597
- 2018A Discourse-Aware Attention Model for Abstractive Summarization of Long Documentscited by 478
- 2017CheXNet: Radiologist-Level Pneumonia Detection on Chest X-Rays with Deep Learningcited by 461
- 2020Generating Radiology Reports via Memory-driven Transformercited by 368
- 2023GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desirecited by 361
18 more
- 2020Evaluation of Text Generation: A Surveycited by 277
- 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
- 2021QuestEval: Summarization Asks for Fact-based Evaluationcited by 244
- 2020CheXclusion: Fairness gaps in deep chest X-ray classifierscited by 153
- 2022Revisiting the Gold Standard: Grounding Summarization Evaluation with Robust Human Evaluationcited by 142
- 2023Interactive and Explainable Region-guided Radiology Report Generationcited by 140
- 2023Opportunities and Challenges for ChatGPT and Large Language Models in Biomedicine and Healthcited by 118
- 2022MEDFAIR: Benchmarking Fairness for Medical Imagingcited by 68
- 2019Pairwise Fairness for Ranking and Regressioncited by 58
- 2022Improving the Fairness of Chest X-ray Classifierscited by 52
- 2024Automated Radiology Report Generation: A Review of Recent Advancescited by 43
- 2024CXPMRG-Bench: Pre-training and Benchmarking for X-ray Medical Report Generation on CheXpert Plus Datasetcited by 35
- 2021RadFusion: Benchmarking Performance and Fairness for Multimodal Pulmonary Embolism Detection from CT and EHRcited by 32
- 2023RadAdapt: Radiology Report Summarization via Lightweight Domain Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 24
- 2024Flexible and Adaptable Summarization via Expertise Separationcited by 7
- 2024ScholarChemQA: Unveiling the Power of Language Models in Chemical Research Question Answeringcited by 6
- 2023Evaluate underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis bias of deep learning model on primary open-angle glaucoma diagnosis in under-served patient populationscited by 5
- 2024Rethinking Scientific Summarization Evaluation: Grounding Explainable Metrics on Facet-aware Benchmarkcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026FairLLaVA: Fairness-Aware Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Vision-Language Assistantscited by 1
- 2026When Background Matters: Breaking Medical Vision Language Models by Transferable Attackcited by 1
- 2026GTA: Graph Theory Agent and Benchmark for Algorithmic Graph Reasoning with LLMscited by 0
- 2026Pre-training, Reasoning, Benchmarking: X-ray Report Generation on CheXpert Plus Datasetcited by 0
- 2026Pre-training, Reasoning, Benchmarking: X-ray Report Generation on CheXpert Plus Dataset23 Sep 2026
- 2026GTA: Graph Theory Agent and Benchmark for Algorithmic Graph Reasoning with LLMs10 Sep 2026
- 2026When Background Matters: Breaking Medical Vision Language Models by Transferable Attack19 Apr 2026
- 2026FairLLaVA: Fairness-Aware Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Vision-Language Assistants27 Mar 2026