mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluate underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis bias of deep learning model on primary open-angle glaucoma diagnosis in under-served patient populations

arXiv 2301.11315 ↗First posted 26 Jan 2023cs.CV cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the United States, primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is the leading cause of blindness, especially among African American and Hispanic individuals. Deep learning has been widely used to detect POAG using fundus images as its performance is comparable to or even surpasses diagnosis by clinicians. However, human bias in clinical diagnosis may be reflected and amplified in the widely-used deep learning models, thus impacting their performance. Biases may cause (1) underdiagnosis, increasing the risks of delayed or inadequate treatment, and (2) overdiagnosis, which may increase individuals' stress, fear, well-being, and unnecessary/costly treatment. In this study, we examined the underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis when applying deep learning in POAG detection based on the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) from 22 centers across 16 states in the United States. Our results show that the widely-used deep learning model can underdiagnose or overdiagnose underserved populations. The most underdiagnosed group is female younger (< 60 yrs) group, and the most overdiagnosed group is Black older (>=60 yrs) group. Biased diagnosis through traditional deep learning methods may delay disease detection, treatment and create burdens among under-served populations, thereby, raising ethical concerns about using deep learning models in ophthalmology clinics.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2023.

Builds on

9 of 39 references.

References · 9

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  4. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  5. 2017On Fairness and Calibrationcited by 406
  6. 2020CheXclusion: Fairness gaps in deep chest X-ray classifierscited by 153
  7. 2018Disc-aware Ensemble Network for Glaucoma Screening from Fundus Imagecited by 39
  8. 2021Clinical Evidence Engine: Proof-of-Concept For A Clinical-Domain-Agnostic Decision Support Infrastructurecited by 3
  9. 2020Exploring Gender Disparities in Time to Diagnosiscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.