Disentangling Linguistic Features with Dimension-Wise Analysis of Vector Embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding the inner workings of neural embeddings, particularly in models such as BERT, remains a challenge because of their high-dimensional and opaque nature. This paper proposes a framework for uncovering the specific dimensions of vector embeddings that encode distinct linguistic properties (LPs). We introduce the Linguistically Distinct Sentence Pairs (LDSP-10) dataset, which isolates ten key linguistic features such as synonymy, negation, tense, and quantity. Using this dataset, we analyze BERT embeddings with various methods, including the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, mutual information, and recursive feature elimination, to identify the most influential dimensions for each LP. We introduce a new metric, the Embedding Dimension Impact (EDI) score, which quantifies the relevance of each embedding dimension to a LP. Our findings show that certain properties, such as negation and polarity, are robustly encoded in specific dimensions, while others, like synonymy, exhibit more complex patterns. This study provides insights into the interpretability of embeddings, which can guide the development of more transparent and optimized language models, with implications for model bias mitigation and the responsible deployment of AI systems.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2025.
Builds on
23 of 38 references.
References · 23
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,304
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,360
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,915
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,309
- 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 849
- 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 809
- 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 455
- 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 332
- 2018Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 277
- 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
- 2020Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structurecited by 205
- 2018What Is One Grain of Sand in the Desert? Analyzing Individual Neurons in Deep NLP Modelscited by 124
11 more
- 2018Identifying and Controlling Important Neurons in Neural Machine Translationcited by 110
- 2020Analyzing Individual Neurons in Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 97
- 2021Neuron-level Interpretation of Deep NLP Models: A Surveycited by 81
- 2021On the Pitfalls of Analyzing Individual Neurons in Language Modelscited by 61
- 2017SPINE: SParse Interpretable Neural Embeddingscited by 55
- 2020Intrinsic Probing through Dimension Selectioncited by 45
- 2015Sparse Overcomplete Word Vector Representationscited by 43
- 2017Semantic Structure and Interpretability of Word Embeddingscited by 21
- 2022Discovering Salient Neurons in Deep NLP Modelscited by 21
- 2024Recent advances in text embedding: A Comprehensive Review of Top-Performing Methods on the MTEB Benchmarkcited by 19
- 2018Clinical Concept Extraction with Contextual Word Embeddingcited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.