Multi-Stage Retrieval for Operational Technology Cybersecurity Compliance Using Large Language Models: A Railway Casestudy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Operational Technology Cybersecurity (OTCS) continues to be a dominant challenge for critical infrastructure such as railways. As these systems become increasingly vulnerable to malicious attacks due to digitalization, effective documentation and compliance processes are essential to protect these safety-critical systems. This paper proposes a novel system that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) and multi-stage retrieval to enhance the compliance verification process against standards like IEC 62443 and the rail-specific IEC 63452. We first evaluate a Baseline Compliance Architecture (BCA) for answering OTCS compliance queries, then develop an extended approach called Parallel Compliance Architecture (PCA) that incorporates additional context from regulatory standards. Through empirical evaluation comparing OpenAI-gpt-4o and Claude-3.5-haiku models in these architectures, we demonstrate that the PCA significantly improves both correctness and reasoning quality in compliance verification. Our research establishes metrics for response correctness, logical reasoning, and hallucination detection, highlighting the strengths and limitations of using LLMs for compliance verification in railway cybersecurity. The results suggest that retrieval-augmented approaches can significantly improve the efficiency and accuracy of compliance assessments, particularly valuable in an industry facing a shortage of cybersecurity expertise.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2025.
Builds on
15 of 60 references.
References · 15
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 686
- 2024MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?cited by 586
- 2024Long-context LLMs Struggle with Long In-context Learningcited by 286
- 2024Judging the Judges: Evaluating Alignment and Vulnerabilities in LLMs-as-Judgescited by 205
- 2024LLM as a Mastermind: A Survey of Strategic Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 99
- 2024Evaluating Retrieval Quality in Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 90
- 2024(A)I Am Not a Lawyer, But...: Engaging Legal Experts towards Responsible LLM Policies for Legal Advicecited by 63
- 2024Transformers and Large Language Models for Efficient Intrusion Detection Systems: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 21
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Retrieval Augmented Generation-based Large Language Models for Bridging Transportation Cybersecurity Legal Knowledge Gaps
- 2024CyberMetric: A Benchmark Dataset based on Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Evaluating LLMs in Cybersecurity Knowledge
- 2026Towards the Development of an LLM-Based Methodology for Automated Security Profiling in Compliance with Ukrainian Cybersecurity Regulations
- 2026From Legacy Documentation to OSCAL: An MCP-Based Agent Pipeline for Threat-Informed Continuous Compliance in Critical Infrastructure
- 2025Explainable Compliance Detection with Multi-Hop Natural Language Inference on Assurance Case Structure
- 2025Adapting Large Language Models to Emerging Cybersecurity using Retrieval Augmented Generation
- 2026CTRAG: An In-Context Retrieval-based Framework for Automated Compliance Checking using LLMs
- 2025Leveraging Large Language Models for Cybersecurity Risk Assessment -- A Case from Forestry Cyber-Physical Systems