mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FedX: Adaptive Model Decomposition and Quantization for IoT Federated Learning

arXiv 2504.12849 ↗First posted 17 Apr 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Learning (FL) allows collaborative training among multiple devices without data sharing, thus enabling privacy-sensitive applications on mobile or Internet of Things (IoT) devices, such as mobile health and asset tracking. However, designing an FL system with good model utility that works with low computation/communication overhead on heterogeneous, resource-constrained mobile/IoT devices is challenging. To address this problem, this paper proposes FedX, a novel adaptive model decomposition and quantization FL system for IoT. To balance utility with resource constraints on IoT devices, FedX decomposes a global FL model into different sub-networks with adaptive numbers of quantized bits for different devices. The key idea is that a device with fewer resources receives a smaller sub-network for lower overhead but utilizes a larger number of quantized bits for higher model utility, and vice versa. The quantization operations in FedX are done at the server to reduce the computational load on devices. FedX iteratively minimizes the losses in the devices' local data and in the server's public data using quantized sub-networks under a regularization term, and thus it maximizes the benefits of combining FL with model quantization through knowledge sharing among the server and devices in a cost-effective training process. Extensive experiments show that FedX significantly improves quantization times by up to 8.43X, on-device computation time by 1.5X, and total end-to-end training time by 1.36X, compared with baseline FL systems. We guarantee the global model convergence theoretically and validate local model convergence empirically, highlighting FedX's optimization efficiency.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2025.

Builds on

20 of 41 references.

References · 20

  1. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  2. 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,220
  3. 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 780
  4. 2019Once-for-All: Train One Network and Specialize it for Efficient Deploymentcited by 778
  5. 2019FedMD: Heterogenous Federated Learning via Model Distillationcited by 454
  6. 2021Data-Free Knowledge Distillation for Heterogeneous Federated Learningcited by 380
  7. 2021FedKD: Communication Efficient Federated Learning via Knowledge Distillationcited by 185
  8. 2020TiFL: A Tier-based Federated Learning Systemcited by 95
  9. 2022Client Selection in Federated Learning: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 62
  10. 2021DAdaQuant: Doubly-adaptive quantization for communication-efficient Federated Learningcited by 40
  11. 2019Accuracy vs. Efficiency: Achieving Both through FPGA-Implementation Aware Neural Architecture Searchcited by 38
  12. 2022MetaFed: Federated Learning among Federations with Cyclic Knowledge Distillation for Personalized Healthcarecited by 36
8 more
  1. 2022Faster Adaptive Federated Learningcited by 35
  2. 2021CompOFA: Compound Once-For-All Networks for Faster Multi-Platform Deploymentcited by 26
  3. 2023Privacy and Efficiency of Communications in Federated Split Learningcited by 20
  4. 2022Communication-Efficient Federated Learning for Heterogeneous Edge Devices Based on Adaptive Gradient Quantizationcited by 14
  5. 2023Complement Sparsification: Low-Overhead Model Pruning for Federated Learningcited by 12
  6. 2020A Closer Look at Codistillation for Distributed Trainingcited by 8
  7. 2023Speed Up Federated Learning in Heterogeneous Environment: A Dynamic Tiering Approachcited by 3
  8. 2022Model Segmentation for Storage Efficient Private Federated Learning with Top r Sparsificationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.