mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Complement Sparsification: Low-Overhead Model Pruning for Federated Learning

arXiv 2303.06237 ↗First posted 10 Mar 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.DCcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Learning (FL) is a privacy-preserving distributed deep learning paradigm that involves substantial communication and computation effort, which is a problem for resource-constrained mobile and IoT devices. Model pruning/sparsification develops sparse models that could solve this problem, but existing sparsification solutions cannot satisfy at the same time the requirements for low bidirectional communication overhead between the server and the clients, low computation overhead at the clients, and good model accuracy, under the FL assumption that the server does not have access to raw data to fine-tune the pruned models. We propose Complement Sparsification (CS), a pruning mechanism that satisfies all these requirements through a complementary and collaborative pruning done at the server and the clients. At each round, CS creates a global sparse model that contains the weights that capture the general data distribution of all clients, while the clients create local sparse models with the weights pruned from the global model to capture the local trends. For improved model performance, these two types of complementary sparse models are aggregated into a dense model in each round, which is subsequently pruned in an iterative process. CS requires little computation overhead on the top of vanilla FL for both the server and the clients. We demonstrate that CS is an approximation of vanilla FL and, thus, its models perform well. We evaluate CS experimentally with two popular FL benchmark datasets. CS achieves substantial reduction in bidirectional communication, while achieving performance comparable with vanilla FL. In addition, CS outperforms baseline pruning mechanisms for FL.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2023.

Builds on

19 of 27 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  2. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  3. 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
  4. 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 780
  5. 2018Rethinking the Value of Network Pruningcited by 595
  6. 2017Deep Gradient Compression: Reducing the Communication Bandwidth for Distributed Trainingcited by 471
  7. 2020Flower: A Friendly Federated Learning Research Frameworkcited by 449
  8. 2018Adaptive Federated Learning in Resource Constrained Edge Computing Systemscited by 408
  9. 2020Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuningcited by 398
  10. 2019Model Pruning Enables Efficient Federated Learning on Edge Devicescited by 219
  11. 2021FjORD: Fair and Accurate Federated Learning under heterogeneous targets with Ordered Dropoutcited by 192
  12. 2020Adaptive Gradient Sparsification for Efficient Federated Learning: An Online Learning Approachcited by 80
7 more
  1. 2019Pruning from Scratchcited by 72
  2. 2020LotteryFL: Personalized and Communication-Efficient Federated Learning with Lottery Ticket Hypothesis on Non-IID Datasetscited by 60
  3. 2021Federated Dropout -- A Simple Approach for Enabling Federated Learning on Resource Constrained Devicescited by 56
  4. 2019The Generalization-Stability Tradeoff In Neural Network Pruningcited by 54
  5. 2020Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 39
  6. 2021QuPeD: Quantized Personalization via Distillation with Applications to Federated Learningcited by 32
  7. 2021Personalized Federated Learning by Structured and Unstructured Pruning under Data Heterogeneitycited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 6; 2026: 2.

12 papers.